Love and emotions are not the domain of "women." Loving and emotion is absolutley masculine/manly!

One of the biggest misunderstandings of manliness and masculinity is that it means one is an emotionless entity. That just because of masculinity being associated classically with a form of stoicism means that manliness means to be unfeeling. To be an uncaring and callous domination over others and things. This could not be further from the truth of manliness and masculinity. The truth of the matter is that manliness is filled with emotion and love. Men do express and act on their emotions differently than women usually, but, they still have them. To argue I as a man do not love or have emotions is to deny my humanity. To deny masculinity has an emotional component is to deny men have a consciousness at all.

I am going to argue that manliness and masculinity are built on core principles of nurturing. Those principles are protection, provision and production. Men are traditionally and historically the human animal that protects, provides and produces for other individuals. This includes guarding against the barbarians at the gates in our human history. It includes being the hunters of our species food and protection of those around them. It includes being historically the workers outside the home whom made the money and then provisioned it to ones wife and children. It was about producing the things needed to help you and your kin to survive.

All of these things are emotional as much as material. All of these are forms of nurturing other than breaking down into an emotional honey trap of tears while arrows fly at you. Emotional mastery as found in traditional masculine and manly archetypes is a form of emotional strength and resilience. It is also a form of self nurturing which helps to be able to do the things needed to nurture other people; including historically ones kin. You cannot have emotional mastery without emotions; even very intense and overwhelming emotions which you learn to nurture and master. Mastery is a form of love in a serious way.

Men protect other people throughout time immemorial. Please do not listen the to the rabid anti-history feminists whom claim history is built on men oppressing women. The truth is that it is the total opposite. Every single strict rule for women was put in not to oppress them, but, as a form of trading freedom for protection. Why did women not work? Due to how dangerous it was for women to work at the jobs that existed at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution that is why. It was a continuation of the idea of women being safe at home protected while men were out hunting for food. Any man that oppresses another person irregardless of gender is an aberration from a man and a brutal, savage monster. He is the opposite of masculine he is damaged.

Oh, wait you say, what about the vote? The vote was not a right it was a privilege associated with going to war associated with conscription. It was a way of protecting women from war and destruction not meant as a form of oppression. Not only that, but, not all men could vote only certain sectors and classes could. Women eventually got their right to vote, but, men never did. To this day Men in the USA NEED TO BY LAW register with Selected Service (AKA the list used for Drafts). Women do not meaning they have no responsibility to the Military they have something for nothing.

Does this mean I support those security over freedom rules? Of course not, but, it is not oppression at all. There is a specific definition of oppression and that would not be it. The point is that masculinity is not and never has been about oppressing other people. It has always been about protection, provision, production and I will also throw in procreation as well. It has been all about nurturing, but, just in a different way from women. Men, manliness and masculinity has always been emotional, loving and these things are not "feminine" or "womanly" things. Masculinity is nurturing at its core and manliness is definitely not cold or emotionless. Love is manly and love is masculine. Love is human after all!

Ringing in a New Year: Do not be afraid to have Shameless Pride in 2017 it is beautiful!

This passed 2016 is leaving us and 2017 is about to begin. It is time to go out with the old and in with the new. A time for saying to goodbye to whom we were and hello to whom we are now. A time to let the past go and embrace the now, our future. For me removing the old year and beginning a new includes saying goodbye to an unauthentic me. It includes ringing in the real me and presenting it in an authentic manor to all I meet. It includes forgiving ourselves and giving ourselves unlimited self--compassion. With letting things become a water under a bridge.

Tonight I was told I am the most kind-hearted person one of my co workers ever met. I must admit it touched me on a very personal level. We are going into the New Year and to know this made me very happy to know it. It showed me that indeed I am the man of value I prize myself on being. It helped to cement within my mind that I am that great man I always pride myself on being. It gives me even more practical confidence to expand my positive attitude even more. As this year gets under way I plan on ringing it in right. With a huge dose of shameless Christopher Pride!

Howard Roark's Defense in Court from "The Fountainhead."

The role of Biology is right in your faces. A rejoinder to anyone that thinks we are a "Blank Slate" (even Objectivists and the MRM).

It gets very frustrating to see the role of biology in human behavior being eschewed for nonsense when the evidence is present right before your very eyes. You see this blank slate argument coming from every side of the coin. From the feminist on the left to the Objectivists on the right. I want to point out that all animals have natures something that Objectivism itself points out. I also want to point out that all animals have a biological disposition. The idea that we are separate from nature in this way is silly at best and ludicrous at worst. It is unscientific to claim that biology and evolution ends at the neck and does not extend into the brain and human mind. 

From the left you have the people that want a new Marxist man and also the feminist types. They both want to use social engineering to alter human nature due to not believing that humans have one. This is a sickening view that totally devalues human life and makes me want to vomit to be honest. Men should be able to break with masculinity because "testosterone don't do nothing." There is no biology to men being men. To men being masculine and tending to be certain ways with others and themselves. It is all nurture and nature plays no part in men being whom and what they are. It is sick and twisted to be sure. 

However, how are SOME Right Objectivists any better when they believe that free will is so absolute that we have no innate tendencies? We have no innate functions, emotions, views, predilections for this or that. That evolution does indeed stop at the neck and there is no innateness to the human. That we are all a blank slate if you will and have no human nature. Despite Objectivism saying we have one and must live by that nature. That man is qua man and cannot be anything, but, man qua man. Which means that if there is even a little bit of biology to anything it must be acknowledged and worked with in this framework. 

Evolution is real and biology is real it can be seen/studied/understood. How can it be that our biology not be a factor in the midst of our lives and choices? Of course it is and it is in the center of everything from mate selection to why we love Fast and fatty foods. The idea that we have no innateness is insane. The idea that we do not have evolved traits which helped to make our species survive and thus still survive even if buried deep is insane. I say to THESE Objectivists you are acting like cultists denying reality as opposed to letting reality be the final arbiter which is part of Objectivism itself. 

I have as much of an issue with those MRA's whom deny evolutionary reasons for various things they like to blame on other things like society. For example; it is not society that deems men to be in the most dangerous of jobs it is the biological differences between the sexes. Women could not and cannot still often times work some of the most deadliest jobs as well as men. Why? Do to their nature mainly pregnancy worries, but, also the differences in strength. The average "feminine" women and the average "masculine" man are just different in many regards to upper body strength it cannot be denied. So, jobs where lifting for example takes place will be mostly men. Construction will be mostly men and so forth. 

You will never get women taking over all the dangerous jobs; sorry, but, this is one of those Nature being a Tyrant things we will never escape. Most women just have different preferences than men. Which means that MRA's whom preach that everything is some Gynocentric Societal Construction are just as inane and loony as the feminists that preach about some Patriarchal Societal Construction against women. I have said it before and will say it again Gender Roles are the domain of nature the Tyrant and not absolute free willed choice. Unless you rewire women and men's natures we will never have "egalitarianism." The idea is against the very biology that makes our species survive and is an affront to Nature.    

All we can do is protect all individuals right to pursue their own happiness irregardless of if it is determined or absolutely free. By doing this one can act from nature, nurture or both and be safe in acting. Be safe in being whom and what they are. Be safe in being left alone instead of being a sacrifice to their neighbors needs and desires. This is what is required; the fire for the engine does not matter, but, to have a just society the engine needs to be able to run like clockwork. The fuel for that engine is irrelevant as long as it is not forced from others and is done via rational and voluntary means. The FACT that biology is a driver of many of our human actions does not alter what is moral or practical it all remains the same. 

The most important person to trust is yourself and then others can earn your trust.

Sometimes you need to stop and ask yourself do I trust the person that matters the most? Do I trust myself in any situation? To be a good person and do the right thing? To be virtuous and and a person of value? The answer for most people whom are not mentally defective is absolutely yes. Or it should be yes! Backed up with evidence of your ability to be so based on the kind of person you are. If you do not trust yourself then you cannot learn to trust others. Inner trust is required before you can learn to trust others. Inner trust then goes out towards others, but, it all begins within and in attitude.

If one does not have inner trust it makes it hard to act to live a good life. Why should anyone want to be around you if you cannot trust yourself? I mean you are not trustworthy, so, why would anyone want to be around someone that cannot be trusted? You need to trust yourself first before others can trust you. You need inner truth and inner self-compassion for yourself. From there all else can come from simply sewing that little seed. Once you learn to know how and why to trust yourself you can extend that same understanding to others as well.

Another bout with BisexualRealTalk and his so-called "bidar" garbage is just that junk.

The other night I had found that BisexualRealTalk had a new video up and decided to give it a watch. This one was on Bi-sexual radar and whether it was real or not. I was expecting some sort of destruction of the idea that bisexual radar existed, but, found quite the opposite. A video bestowing upon his audience that indeed there is a bisexual radar that exists. Which to that I say it is junk and nonsense. How do you tell someone is bisexual without them telling you? I mean we are not talking about people that are out there throwing off signals to other people. He himself separated bisexuals from "queers" in a previous video. So, how can you tell? 

He presents a bunch of utter junk as supposed evidence of a bisexual radar and all of it is idiotic. Ranging from micro expressions to someones hair cut. Really? So, if I get my haircut a certain way that indicates something about whom I am attracted to? Garbage and junk all of it. Gender expression he also adds in there, but, most bisexuals are mostly straight and not "non-conforming." This makes no sense in anyway as a sign of bisexuality at all. The only way you can know if someone is bisexual to any extent is to ask them. To be inquisitive and ask the question to the person. 

So-called Academic Paper claims "masculine same sex attraction" is Male Misogyny.

Sometimes you read something so ludicrous it makes you feel like hitting your head on your desk. Recently I came across a paper that made me want to do just that till my head bled, but, as I am sane I did not. A group of Radical feminist Scholars in academia are claiming that masculine bisexual and homosexual men are somehow brainwashed fools. Or are devious fiends depending on how you read their paper. That they are in fact "becoming part of the masculine ideology of female oppression." Yes, men not sleeping with women are oppressing them if those men are not effeminate and are in fact manly men. The insanity is so high it leaks off the page into the air. 

It is pointed out that most effeminate bi and homosexual men stop being feminine and begin to de-feminize as they called it usually during or following their adolescents. Is this pointed out to be the obvious testosterone flood of hormones and brain chemistry during this formative time of a growing boys life? The most obvious culprit that they have if anything received the replacement flood for the testosterone they might have missed out on in the womb? Nope, not at all it is that they are giving into "their oppressors" the heterosexual patriarchy. I have never heard such ridiculous inane bullshit like this in a long, long time. 

So, manly and masculine homos and bis are basically Trojan Horses in disguise and they are even worse "repressing their true selves." Bullshit, masculine men that have or even might continue to be with other men are not "repressing their true selves." This is just what and whom they are and nothing more. The idea that bi and homosexual equals an effete pussy with a purse for a mouth and a swish for a walk is totally built up from a straw man. There are 6 pack ab, Greek god looking, swaggering Alpha male bis and homosexuals just as much as there is heterosexuals. 

This is insane! Most men whom have been with other men you would not even know had been. They do not walk around saying look at me I have been with another man. They are just a typical man with a typical masculinity. In fact, most men that have been with men turn out mostly straight as they grow up and more than likely end up in long term commitments to women. I have noticed this myself with myself currently having no desire to pair bond with a man. I would still sleep with one, but, I have no desire for a commitment to a man at this time. Nor is a man my first choice for mating, but, I am not going to deny with the right one I could. 

The role of biology and that we are talking about men is never considered in this article. The idea that a man could "masculinize" over time just due to internal hormonal and neurological forces is not even considered. The idea that men have a hormone called testosterone which when in balance and properly circulating tends to cause masculine behavior and interests is not even considered. That there is an interplay with society and nature or biology and neural programming is never considered. The idea that testosterone will change your voice when you get enough of a rush of it is not even considered. Or your walk or anything else they might be meaning.

Next we move onto their thesis that the only reason to detest Queens and "feminine" men is because of the hatred of women. First of all it is not true in the slightest. To point out that it seems exaggerated and performative over authentic when you run into a flaming queen is not saying you hate or detest said person. It is simply pointing out, "hey man you do not act like that all the time it comes and goes.. just be yourself." Also, there is a difference between being "feminine" and a catty toxic bitch like most "feminine" men act and Queens are the worst. They have all the worst traits of the biggest bitches and toxic women with a penis. Sorry, they just do! Trust me I have been around the community long enough to know!

I am not a fan of flaming gay men at all to be honest. Their attitude drives me crazy and I put that as the reason over anything else. It has nothing to do with a hatred of women or even the feminine per-say. It has to do with their attitude and it has to do with their behavior. On both scores they drive me batty and the fact that so many of them are presented as the face of bisexual or gay men drives me bananas. It is my opinion that "community" needs a major injection of men with proper masculine virtue and whom do not go out of their way to perform a stereotype. Give me a man whom is not closeted, but, not a camp "Queer Eye" wannabe any day! It is performative and it is annoying!

 

 

I love Being Masculine!

The existence of a State is not the same as state-ism and minarchism or bust.

Last night I found myself enthralled in a debate between different factions of the liberty movement. Specifically about which view is the most consistent with the goals of libertarianism and the Libertarian Party of America. The debate an age old one between minarchists and anarcho-capitalists. The clear winner with much head shaking, head palming was the minarchist position. The position I myself hold, but, I tend not to use the term itself as it just confuses things. 

The definition of a minarchist is someone whom wants the State to exist, but, for it to be a Nightwatchman State. In other words it should catch the crooks, fraudsters and perdition, but, leave peaceful people alone. In other words a State which is enforcing the Zero-Aggression principle more or less. A State which does nothing of which an-caps rail on about and they have no reason to call statist. In my view taxation should not exist as it is theft, but, neither should a stateless society. 

For me government is not a necessary evil,  but, is in fact a symbol of human goodness. A properly limited government; a nightwatchman state is the only truly moral form of freedom we can have. As it is the only way to defend individual rights and use if needed excessive retaliatory force against evil people whom wish to harm others and their property. Capitalism requires governance it requires rule of law. It requires due process and for laws to be objectively obtained. It requires us to be able to have guaranteed protection of our life, liberty and property from harm. Thus it requires a state; a centralized power structure with enforceable laws. 

This does not mean it needs to initiate force on anyone that is peaceful. It does mean that those whom are not peaceful will face the full force of the law; whether through a bullet or through the process of a trial. This is required for us to maintain the peace for human nature is not all wine and roses. There are genuine nutcases that do not care about others and wish them harm. A government; a proper and true government, works on behalf of protecting the innocent against the proven guilty. It works to defend all of our rights and that is the reason it is an immense moral good and sign of human progress. 

A properly limited government is a beacon on a hill of a sign of progress. It is leaving the tribe and war of all against all towards a world of voluntary interaction and coexistence. Properly limited and good governance is an immense good because without it there would be chaos and destruction. I am not being hyperbolic here we have a lot of irrational and dangerous people in this world whom government protects us from everyday. National defense and domestic defense requires a government and sometimes a very powerful and highly centralized one to work over an entire Nation. 

This does not mean this government should intervene in the economy in anyway. It is there for one thing and one thing only to protect our rights. Getting involved in the economic and personal lives of citizens is not its job. To protect our life, liberty and property is its job and soul reason for existing. This is why taxation is theft it says the government gets a right to take the product of your own labor. In a high enough tax bracket it becomes being a total surf like something from Feudalism. Government is required, but, ideally all funding is voluntary. Acting as dues or user fees for services rendered. 

Minarchism is voluntaryism as it was traditionally defined as a nation/government that protects individual rights and the ability to have voluntary cooperation. While being funded also on a voluntary means and existing solely due to the consent of the governed. Anarchists stole the term voluntaryism from a minarchism political philosophy which resembles Objectivism and Classical Liberalism as opposed to statelessness. It was another term for a radical for capitalism and for a member of the logically consistent wing of the Classical Liberal tradition. A term never meant to be used to mean anarchism at all. 

The an-caps in this debate just kept circling back and not answering the question. Making claims that minarchists are not being logically consistent for some reason. They kept claiming that human nature did not have a dark side and it was somehow manufactured as if out of whole cloth from their enemy the state. It reminded me of feminists claiming everything evil comes from the patriarchy, but, replace that with state in and of itself. At one point they even argued there was no right to an attorney to defend you and basically that rule of law was bullshit. At one point saying the only rule of law they needed was a gun in the face of the accused. Basically, they denied the need for innocence until proven guilty without wanting to admit it. 

This was barbarism and tribalism at its worst. This was not the good and positive primal male and female defenders, but, the lynch mob. I am not saying that primates are amazingly great, we are not and never have been perfect. However, the good aspects of the primal I talk about getting back have nothing to do with this horrid collectivist tribal gang warfare mentality. I was shocked, stunned and frankly disgusted that they were speaking about rolling back things which have made civilization possible. It is one thing to privatize anything non-law related that moves and everything non-law related that does not. However, this was just insane. I am all for self-defense, but, there is a difference between walking in on a rape in progress and killing the fucker, and, doing away with rule of law for the accused of a crime. 

An objectively determined rule of law is needed in a civilized society. Even with the NAP you need to have objectively defined laws and need to be able to essentialize actual laws based on zero aggression. We do not have lynch mobs and we will not be going back to the Crusades or Witch Hunts because of irrational fools that are against government at all costs. It is folks like these that make it hard to call myself a libertarian anymore. The idea that people just willy-nilly perpetuating vigilante justice is a moral ideal is sickening. I want in no way to be affiliated with such bile. The anarchic wing of the libertarian movement ruins everything. How are we to deal with Islamic Fascism without a state/government? Blank out as they always do. Excuse me as I go to the funeral of the Western World.

Confessions of a Climate Change Skeptic

There was a time when I was very much a believer in the idea that climate change was a major issue that needed to be tackled. That was before I actually looked into all the studies and not just some of them pre-picked by the UN or other groups whom had a vested interest in there being a catastrophe.
I realized climate was not in the horrible state it was said to be and in fact the environment is much better in this era than it had been in our human past. We are living one of the Greenest forms of planet Earth that has ever existed.

Not only that, but, the vast majority of climate alterations is not even human caused. There is much more natural influence on the overall climate as part of Earths climate cycle than humans. Water Vapor is the most important greenhouse gas for alterations in Earths climate along with various sunspot and solar cycles. Man-Made CO2 pales in comparison to the effects of all the natural inputs on the Earths climate sensitivity. In fact, the Earth has been in a cooling phase since around 1998. Where it is either cooled or stayed the same with a complete stop in Global Warming overall. Even the Met Office in the UK had mentioned this at one point.

I not only find no climate catastrophe, but, find very little credible evidence for the climate changing by very much at all since around 2000. Not when you look at all the actual satellite minus the computer models biases. It shows clearly there is no issue and the globe is not changing the way it was thought to be within the broader scheme of things.

Which is a pity really because as we are in fact still in an Inter-glacial Period historically we should be pumping much more CO2 into our cooled down atmosphere to make it warmer than it is now. I say far from dissing the Oil Sands we should be looking for more of them all over the West. Dig, find that black gold and stop feeding the Saudi Arabians that support the likes of ISIS.

CO2 is a necessary element of life and it is NOT a pollutant it is food for this Earth and its organisms. Not only that, but, fossil fuels help make it so we can have all the wonderful things that help us survive. Including helping to run life saving medicines, schools and all of our homes. I love fossil fuels and I also think we should be using more Nuclear Energy too. Wind cannot sustain the infrastructure of a major city. We need actual fuel like fossil fuel and nuclear energy.

The point is the environment lobby really only looks at studies they do themselves or that proves them right. They never look at all the studies or all the research and see what is really out in the science. Only viewing studies to see they agree with you is not scientific and nor is it reasonable. I look at all kinds of sources for my information and go by what I find.

I do not just go by one or two sources. We are in a lot of ways in one of the most clean generations of this Earth and we are not in an apocalypse things are good right now. People are just too blinded with BS information, myths, lies and downright stupidity. To paraphrase John Stossel's old special name.

Relax the world is fine, the world is not ending and it is not as horrid as your worried wort negative thinking wants it too be. We are all too many of us seeing only the bad and often wrong stories. We do not see how we are living even for all the crap in one of the best times to be alive for so many reasons. Lighten up people and enjoy life. We only got one, so, live it while you can and quit worrying that the world is ending. It is not, it is just your primate wetware mind needing a boogeyman to fight. 

No, Donald Trump Flag burning should NOT be criminalized! It is called Freedom of Speech!

Sorry, Mr. President, but, burning flags is defended by this little concept called freedom of speech and expression. It is defended by the 1st Amendment right you as a Republican nominee is supposed to defend under the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America. You do not get to throw a fucking hissy fit when you are offended by speech. You are acting no better than the rioters whom are rioting you if you think it is OK to go after the free speech of people that want to say something you disagree with.

You do not get to dictate the removal of the cornerstone of the Republic because you are an elected Republican president. It is your elected duty as a Republican to defend the 1st amendment of the constitution just like all of the other bills of rights. You made an entire campaign on being against political correctness and what do you end up doing? Being just as afraid of being offended as the Social Justice Warriors. You are claiming to be a Republican and you dare consider yourself an Alpha Male.

Alpha Males do not care what other people are doing as long as they keep their hands to themselves. They do not try and squash other peoples rights. They if anything do not give a shit what other people think. Oh, Mr. President you are being a Beta Cuck crybaby ALA a Male feminist. Whining and complaining because something offends you makes you a try hard phony not an Alpha Male. It started with your calling out the Hamilton stuff. Now it is the flag and what happens to it. For such a strong man you are sure acting like a weak little boy.

Grow some fucking skin and let your balls drop again.. if they ever did yet to begin with. You are more and more looking like a poor excuse of a leader of the Free World. You are slowly losing lots of support with this sort of stunt. Man the fuck up for fucks sake! You are like 70 fucking years old you need to act your fucking age! Not your shoe size! Words and peaceful demonstrations are not something to be afraid of. Nor are they something to interfere in!

This real and true alpha is not happy with your performance so far in your elected post. If you decide to legally act on this garbage and go after the 1st amendment you can suck on my Alpha male cock! And don't you dare spit either! I do not defend the rioters and looters, but, I do not defend you infringing on people's rights either. Mr. Trump you are now President Cuck Elect if you go through with this. Freedom of speech trumps your Trump feels you little pussy! 

Keep a proper attitude it makes all the difference!!

Fuck you #TransLivesMatter!!!! ALL LIVES MATTER!!! ALL LIVES!!!

This habit of making collective groups lives matter over individual lives is starting to become sickening. First it was #BlackLivesMatter and the real world rioting insanity with even killing of cops. Now there is a movement to make #TransLivesMatter starting with this month being Trans Awareness Month. Or should I say last month was it is over now. This is bullshit! This is bullshit!

Individuals human lives matter and it does not matter your orientation, or gender. People do not get to have their deaths matter more because they died having Gender Identity Dysphoria and transitioning for it. Just like Black Lives Matter is bullshit this too is bullshit. All lives matter and not just a select few of the human species. It is horrid to think that anyone would collectivize away individual rights to life.

All lives matter and it does not matter your particular little group you are in. Trans people do not get special magical superiority over the rest of us simply because they have been killed. If you add up the total amount of transgendered people killed VS the amount of the majority killed in the USA it pales in comparison due to how small the actual amount of trans humans is in general. All lives matter people all of them and yes trans people dying is not nice, but, this is the real world where murder exists towards all individuals regardless of gender or gender identity.

There will never be a world where no gays, no lesbians, no straights, no anyone does not get killed. We live in a world with ability to die at the hands of another person this is real life. It is statistically rarer than ever these days, but, it will always happen. We will never live in a heaven on Earth where death and destruction does not exist it is impossible for we are in the real world. Fuck you #TransLivesMattter; all of our lives matter and you do not get to be special snowflakes because you are Trans.

I am more Republican than President Elect Trump

Republicanism is defined as being for a Constitutional Republic with certain checks and balances. Which contains lots of ways of watching the watchers and a very narrow defined role of the government. That role being specifically and historically the national and domestic defense; cops, courts and a military. Using this definition I am a Republican and as Peter Thiel said at the Trump rallies I am proud to be one. I defend a limited government/state as the only moral one that can exist.

I also considered myself to be a lowercase libertarian (as opposed to an upper case member of any Libertarian political party.) As well as understanding of and supporting of Objectivism. These ideas are not in conflict. One can be both a Republican and a libertarian. Just like one can be an Objectivist and Republican. In fact all Objectivism is Republican as all Objectivists support a limited government which is a republic of sorts. That does not mean all Republics in this world are Constitutionally limited governments.

I am defining Republic in this description as only within the spectrum in which Republic means limited constitutional government. Trump is not one he is in favor of all kinds of government programs; such as NSA and The Patriot Act that are completely antithetical of a constitutional republic and a separation of powers with checks/balances. Not too mention he is OK with raising the minimum wage. He now supports possibly Climate Change legislation and is not repealing Obamacare after all. He is also going back on going after Hillary Clinton. He has no principles and he is showing this. Republicanism is principled defense of liberty and limited government. I would be a better Republican President than Trump and I am Canadian!

Trumps Victory is not a Victory for the Right.

I want to start by saying I am not someone whom thinks the world is coming to an end due to Trump being elected president. At the same time I am not a Trump demagogue whom thinks he is the best thing to happen to America either. I am in the middle appreciating some of the ideas he wants to go with and loathing others. I am at heart a positive and optimistic man even in the face of The Trump leading the USA. I want to also say I am not blind to his authoritarian side nor to the authoritarians surrounding him. However, I have hope that the Senate, House Republicans that did not agree with him will fight him tooth and nail. 

Even with this sense of life and optimism I am not blind to the fact this is not a victory for the rightists among us. Trump is a Classic Old-School Leftist anti-free trade and protectionist Democrat. He was what a Democrat was say 20 or 30 years ago and his views on protectionism are more in line with Hillary's rival Bernie Sanders than any mainstream Republicans. This was a win for the Old-School fraction of the left-wing and not a triumph for the secular, pro-reason and capitalist right. This was not a win for Classical Liberalism, Constitutional Republicans, Laissez-faire or libertarians, nor Objectivists. 

While Trump ran on cutting taxes, regulations and repealing Obamacare. He has already began to back peddle and show he really is not concerned with making a more limited government in accordance with the US Constitution and classical liberal principles the cornerstone of the Right. Let alone being a fan of anything near the most Radical of the freedom movement those whom call for stateless liberty. While I am not an an-cap the fact that some An-Caps are supporting him boggles the mind it really does. He has an authoritarian streak that we all need to watch out for. Especially those whom want freedom. 

He has not met any of his promises so far to cut the government down to size and I am hoping that turns around once he begins government. He has reneged in advance on so many promises and my hope in him is slowly waning despite my optimism because of this. I am not going to say he is a horrible person as some have said. I think he is misinformed and ignorant, wrong on a lot of things, but, he is not some evil devil. We need to be weary of him and his aids. We need to watch the direction the government flows. I highly doubt it will be to the genuine right, but, in a weird middle ground. Combining some elements that will be authoritarian with other elements of certain freedoms. 

I refrain any righties to stop saying we won we have not. Nor should we join the rioting nutcases in the streets. He has won fair and square, but, we can still give our voice to the voiceless in the Rational, secular and capitalist right. We have not won whether it is my fellow atheist righties or other secular believers on the right. We have not won and we should not forget this and give into some collectivism over Trump. Collectivism is the real enemy ideology we must fight. This is individualism and individuals vs collectivism and collectivizing people like some Borg. We must remember that is the real foundation to liberty!

 

 

A little bit on my views on the War on Terror.

I think Trump actually had a good idea when he said in his campaign we should stop all immigration from Countries affiliated with groups and ideologies in league with Radical Islam. Not permanently, but, until we have a much better vetting and screening process. As a freedom person I bet you expected me to be a pussy when it comes to the whole War on Terror, but, I am not a pacifist. NAP is not pacifism and I fully consider Islam a real threat governments need to be fighting.

We have been in a War with Islam within the West since the Iranian Hostage situation with the US in the 1970's. That is really when this all began not on 9/11. 9/11 was just one of the most horrendous moments in it. This is an old war really, but, it was not talked much about until 9./11 and it got its own name. The war on Terror, which is a ridiculous name. It is in fact the War with Islam and it always has been. My views are contrary to many libertarians on this issue and the nature of this threat. It is a serious threat akin to the Nazis and WWII and we are not hardly even fighting. We are laying down letting the threat take us out little by little.

We need to do to the various Radical Islam ideology what we did back then. We need to eliminate the threat and yes that means lots of people will lose their life, but, the threat needs to be taken out completely, so, peace can come back. We need to do to Terrorists and their funding sources what we did to the Nazis. Take them out; first give the ultimatum and then no follow through we eliminate them. Yes, that means we need to give Iran an ultimate and then act on it if they do not stop funding terrorist groups. Yes, I mean threaten to attack and do so if they do not comply. Iraq was the wrong target it was not responsible for the terrorist threat, but, Iran is a major cause of it.

We also need to do the same thing with Saudi Arabia; give them an ultimatum to stop supporting Radical Islamic terrorism. If they do not comply well we also go after them too. Those are the real big funding sources of terrorism as well as where most of the propaganda comes from. It was not Iraq that the USA should have gone after. Afghanistan can be seen as a just retaliation to 9/11 to remove a threat. However, the hijackers were all Saudi's after all. In my opinion The West has not been too harsh on fighting Islam, but, not defending itself strong enough. Not being serious enough about eliminating the threat at its true sources. We also need to work on internal Radicals on a more serious level as well.

Yes, you heard me right we are not fighting the war strong enough. This is because we are not fighting wisely we keep choosing bad targets that do not need to be taken out. While over looking all of the legitimate targets we should be working towards dealing with and eliminating. We have been too altruistic and made it into a "War for spreading democracy." Into a "World Police," and it is not is it is a matter of self-defense against legitimate threat which needs to be eliminated. We should not care about spreading anything. We should only care about keeping The West and the citizens in the West safe from a threat. Doing what needs to be done to do that no matter how messy that might be in the process. We need to defend the innocent against these Radical killing machines at all costs.

I am not a warhawk that is wanting War for the sake of war. Not at all, but, Islamic Jihad is too much of a real and ever present threat akin to the Nazis that I cannot take a do nothing position like so many libertarians take. Once the threat is eliminated we will be able to have peace. However, you cannot have peace when we are in this situation that we are in right now. We need to eliminate the threats and be serious about it now, so, that we can have the peaceful Global Capitalist world all freedom lovers want for the future. Hell, once we eliminate the threats then maybe we can have those Open Borders libertarians love so much. However, not while we have a serious threat we have not yet eliminated.

What I agree on with the new Vice President Mike Pence

As I found myself researching more into the new VP Mike Pence I found some interesting things. Some of which was a little out there, but, other things were not so insane. Other things in fact I totally agreed with. The idea of privatizing Social Security absolutely I support. The fact that anti-discrimination laws are anti-religious liberty I agree with and would support a full repeal of all discrimination laws over the private sector. The idea of cutting taxing and regulations I agree with. The ending of Common Core I totally support.

The fact that hate crime laws are "thought crime" laws I completely agree with and would not have passed the Matthew Sheppard Act. Murder is murder, theft is theft you do not get charged more or should not based on the victim being GBLT. All crimes are acts of hate regardless of whom the target is and there is no need to have a separate level of crime based on if you harbor hateful ideas or not. It is the act of committing the crime that is charged and not that you are hating the victim or not. The existence of charter, home and other private schools are a must for a free society.

The idea of having money follow the person and being able to go to a charter or private school is a step in the right direction. I would go even further and not have any tax funded or state ran schools. We should have a free market in education with constant competition pushing the schools to achieve better and better quality education. There are a number of things mentioned on his Wiki that I do agree with. Hell, he even is pro-free trade and trade agreements. It is when you get to his views on GBLT folks that it begins to get a little darker.

He signed a bill related to funding going to conversion therapy for homosexuals. Which was not very nice to find out about, but, still it was for consenting adults that I saw. It was also not forced on the GBLT people in the area it was funding of a voluntary thing. He also was against same-sex marriage as well civil unions. He does also support pro-life views as well. Which depending on your opinion on abortion could be quite a road block. Myself I am very pro-life once the fetus gets to viability and from that point on I do think there needs to be a law against obtaining abortions outside of health of the mother or rape/molestation.

He also passed a bill wherein you cannot get an abortion if it is due to not wanting the race, sex, disability or orientation of the fetus. Which I also completely agree with; self-defense is not defined as defending against having the wrong type of baby. Wherein I disagree with him again is the issue of GBLT stuff and the fact he supported "don't ask don't tell." He also supported the Iraq War which I was not a fan of in anyway. We shall need to wait and see what things are like.

I agree with Trump on removal of anti-discrimination provisions.

Time for people to freak about a controversial view of mine, but, I shall chime in on it anyways. If Trump indeed is for removal of anti-discrimination provisions from the law books I would be someone that supported such a measure. Such laws are immoral and go against the very idea of freedom of association or disassociation which are based on voluntarism in a constitutional Republic. Being able to control ones property externally is a corollary to controlling the property in your person. Legislating that away is immoral and also a breach of the zero-aggression principle/preserving peaceful relations.

We all have the right to control whom is or is not on the property we own and control. Whether that is selling gay wedding cakes from a religious point of view or not allowing anti-gay people inside your gay bar on the other end of things. If I do not want to let members of the KKK dine in my eating establishment that should be legal. It is not under anti-discrimination law because I need to let anyone into my business. It is for this reason that I am against all, I repeat ALL anti-discrimination laws on the books and would advise Trump to tare them up myself if I was advising him.

Let people that discriminate be punished by social ostracization and things like boycotts. Let them go bankrupt and hit where it hurts the pocketbook. Let them hit rock bottom and need to work up again. Let them reap what they sew and no initiation of force needed. We do not need anti-discrimination laws for another reason too due to the fact such laws only pass if people do not believe in discrimination to begin with. Or such laws would not be passed and followed by most people. The majority of people in 2016 would not discriminate against people; not just LGBT people just in general.

As long as the Government treats everyone equally under the law and The State does not discriminate the private citizen should be left free to associate or disassociate with whom they wish on a voluntary basis. This means anti-discrimination laws need to go and should be tossed out. As John Stossel has said before not wanting The state intervening does not equal condoning behavior. It only means that the State is not involved. With absence of The State it does not say anything about absence of non-governmental private organizations to deal with issues of discrimination either. The State has no place in social engineering relations between people though.

Why I will fight peacefully for the right of a "community" I find toxic

I talk a lot about how toxic GBLT communities are on here and how they are toxic. I stand by this statement and will not take what I have said back. However, that does not mean I want these peoples rights to be toxic curtailed by The State in fact far from it. The best way to learn to be more moral is to reap what you sew and not to have force initiated on you. These people will get what is coming to them naturally and one does not use force because one has a disagreement even over concretes. Unless that concrete is the initiation of force itself. 

The toxic community should have its own ability to live as it sees fit no matter how toxic that is. People whom are Kinsey 5-7's have the same individual rights as people not on the scale or at the Straight end like me. I do not wish harm on said individuals which is why I want to point out that the world is not crumbling. Trump will not be repealing Marriage rights or anything of the sort. In addition, even if he did want to he cannot it is a Supreme Court Ruling. The USA system does not work that way.

Everyone has individual rights and own themselves, anything else is to condone slavery. So, toxic people have the right to be toxic. They also have the need to face consequences and reap what they sew they do not get protected from themselves. If Mr. Pence decided to initiate force against the community I would be the first to step in line to defend them. I might not agree with the type of people you are and your mindset. I might not agree with your behavior and exclusivity, but, I sure as hell will fight for your right to exist on this Earth. Individual rights are just that INDIVIDUAL rights. 

You can Stump the Trump and riots are not peaceful protests.

Once again I am writing about this fated election of Donald J. Trump and the response is insane. I mean insane and crazy! People claim Trump is crazy, but, the response to his election is even more insane. Riots are not peaceful protests and it is peaceful protests that are protected under the natural right of self-expression. Not the act of going around and putting other people's lives or property in danger by initiating violence or threatening it. Which is exactly what these rioters are doing in response to the election. Regardless of your views on Trump and Pence none of that excuses harming others or their property. 

That does not include blocking traffic and literally holding people captive on the sidewalks. That does not include threatening to use violence against Trump and his administration. That does not include talking about casualties like this is another Civil War within the USA. Obama has peacefully transitioned with a handshake to the Trump elect. While I think Obama is a corrupt douche he at least is not being a vile scum when it comes to the transition of power. These people that are rioting I have 0 respect for. These people that are looting, settings things on fire and threatening to harm Trump supporters are vile, scum. They might not be bad people deep inside, but, their ideology is evil and has tuned their mindset to vile acts of negative expressions. 

You can stump the Trump and it does not require you to threaten violence against him or his supporters. Nor does it require using violence or threats thereof towards peoples property. Nor does it require blocking streets and turning the USA into a war zone. Congress, the Senate and the House can stump him on anything that his fellow Republicans and remaining house Democrats do not agree on pursuing. One does not need to resort to violence against innocents. In fact, it is never moral to use violence against innocents. Violence and threats of are only moral as a form of self-defense against an initiated threat of the same manor. 

What the Leftists and other extremist Progressives are doing right now is showing how shallow and immoral their views are. They seem nice and flowery on the outside, but, all they know is coercion and forcing people to do their bidding. Even if the Country voted for a view counter to theirs they cannot take it and need people to fall into line. This is insane, it is immoral and it is not something that I think should be happening. Nor is it something the Police should be letting happen. We have riot police for a reason use them to help the innocent against the violent thugs infesting the US streets and show mercy only on those whom will not continue their violence. 

If I were Trumps Advisor after his election.

Today I was told by my best friend that I should have been a personal assistance and advisor to Trump. That way I would have really helped Make America Great Again. It had be me thinking what would I advise Trump of if I was his assistance. So, I decided I would make an article based on what I would tell him and which direction I would want him to be going in with his presidency.

The first line of duty would be to set him straight on his trade policies. Instead of removing NAFTA or TPP to stop "globalization." We should in fact do the opposite and work towards even more free trade and globalization with the rest of the world. We need to work on extending a Global Capitalism's reach into every single under-developed Country. We need to make sure we are trading with other Countries, so, that the under-developed Countries can develop and get out of poverty. The #1 removal of poverty is creating wealth. Extending free trade to the world is the #1 poverty killer. PS: Outsourcing does not remove American's jobs it shuffles the market from doing one type of job to a different one. I agree 110% with Hillary Lair and Con Clinton on this what we need is a completely Open Global Market with goods crossing borders.

The second line of duty would be to make sure that Trump makes good in repealing Obamacare. It needs to go it needs to be abolished, dismantled and torn apart. The answer is as Trump said in the debates all about opening the market and having proper competition for the insurance industry. In order to make them need to provide better insurance or suffer the market forces that will inflict upon them like Karma's Bitch. We need to abolish ALL State involvement in the health care sector! We need to completely "liberalize" the entire market and set market forces on it. So, that the best medical products and health care rises to the top and the worst is destroyed in a beautiful "creative destruction."

The third line of duty is to broaden Trumps tax cuts. Not just corporate taxes need to be slashed, but, the income tax totally abolished. No one should be having their money taken from their paycheck to make the Government run. Any taxes that still existed under my watch would need to be as close to a Voluntary User transactions as possible. So, ALL taxes that are not "voluntary" or close to voluntary need to be removed from the books. A very low say 4 or 5% consumption tax or sales tax would work to be close enough to user fees for me to be satisfied. We need to remove the Initiation of force from peaceful peoples lives in every way possible. Voluntarism, cooperation, charity and good will toward men will replace State initiated force for running the Country. Also, abolish the federal reserve and any state control over currencies. People should be able to use any currencies they want and we should have a free market in money lending not a rigged so-called market.

Fourth and following along the same lines is broaden his regulation cuts. We need to slash and burn the 1000's of pages of regulations which burden people's lives and are nothing, but, the initiation of force on peaceful people. This is immoral and unacceptable for a way of using a governing body over a geographical area. Regulations need to be removed from every sector and every market. Peaceful, voluntarism and Market forces, as well as Private Non-Governmental groups should be the "regulators" of market actors. Not the State, which causes more issues by intervening than not intervening would cause by far.

Fifth on the agenda would be to start a path of legalizing all victim-less crimes and sorting out whom was really innocent from people whom used real criminal actions in their vices. This means prostitution/sex work, personal drug use of any kind and using your body in anyway including suicide would be completely legal. As long as in order to do these vices no initiation of coercion was used and it was being done by adults. The most perverse sexual lifestyle and most nasty BDSM should be allowed provided no coercion was used and the participants are wanting/willing adults. Let free people harming none do what they wish.

Sixth, and far from most least he needs to stick to the Constitution. He needs to make sure he defends the right to bear arms, the right to free expression, the separation between Church and State. The entire bill of rights needs to be honored.

Seventh he should not back down on his fight against Radical Islam. Too few politicians have the guts to talk about the Islamic Threat and he needs to keep hammering it home. As well as take swift, but, decisive action to in fact eliminate ISIS as well as any similar threats. He needs to make good on his promise to defend the West against these sorts of forces that are anti-freedom and anti-mind. 

Eighth on the list goes along with the fifth on the list. Make sure Sir Pence just sort of sits around and or does Trumps bidding. Make sure he does not get to chime in on matters of sexual deviancy. Keep being the man that let Caitlyn Jenner use the female bathroom at Trump Towers.

So, there is my list of what I would say and the direction I would take Trump in. I would take him in the Genuine Constitutional Republic direction. He is after all the Republican Party president and he should put forth a platform. A policy that is in fact Republican and is in fact of The Right. Not some mushy middle of the road bullshit. He needs to rail against Cronyism wherever it maybe and show the world what a Real Capitalist President, a real Republican president can be. With liberty for all and treading on none.

The # rule of living the good life and being happy is being yourself completely.

William Shakespeare famously said in Hamlet, "to thine own self be true." Like much of great classic literature in the English cannon these words are powerful and meaningful in the real world as well. Sometimes men (and women too) start feeling like they need to somehow change themselves as if they are not great people just as they are. They feel that others will judge them even if there is nothing wrong with them. That if they do not meet some ideal with the check list ticked off they are useless and not worthy.

I want to say right here and now that is an unhealthy mindset to have. The most important acceptance is self-acceptance. Just as self-love helps fuel external love in so many ways as well. Anyone whom really wants to be your friend; let alone wants to take the midnight express to O land will accept you for whom you are. If you need to deceive yourself or put on an act to get some or get friendship, or get love it is not worth it. It is living a lie and you are infecting your mind with a falsehood of whom you are.

Never lie to your own brain that is very dangerous. Always be truthful about whom you are with yourself and then the others around you. For I have a secret for you... odds are you are fine just as you are. I have gone through rejection quite a bit in my life, but, I have come to learn not to blame myself for any of it. Whether it was so-called friends that left me or lovers that all of a sudden my "manhood spear" was not good enough for anymore. I have come to realize over time in the end I do not need them.

Only the people that know me, the actual Christopher, the real Chris and love me are worth being in my life. People are not worth trying to hold on to that never really wanted me to begin with. I am better, we all are better being by ourselves than with fakers. Fakers are those two-faced bitches, cunts and bastards that make like they care when they do not. Or they care only for the superficial not for the really important thing you as a person. I love myself just as I am; I am perfect just as I am and I am all the man the right people need.

We all need to learn to love ourselves just as we are. Men especially with all the expectations put on us as men need to realize how great we are. How worthy of the right people we are and how unneeded the fakers are. Having 100 friends that all will leave at the drop of a hat is not a healthy way of living. It is more healthy to have a few great true friends than 100s of fakers. It is better to go through life with a few amazing lovers that rocked your world and wanted to be rocked by the real you. Than to have 100's of fakers that fuck you and leave as soon as the single wrong thing is said or done.

If there were rules I would mention to any other men out there rule # 1 would be just be yourself. That I think is the most manly thing to do. To just be yourself regardless of how many friends or lovers it gets you. It is more important to be true to yourself and just be you than to change to make friends or lovers. Rule#2 would be to stick to your guns when you being you is called out as not good enough. Just keeping doing you your way; be your own man. Now that is manly to me! Fuck negativity and live in the positive. Fuck unreasonable expectations just push on.

When I say be yourself I mean just that. No matter what type of man you are just be it. No matter what archetype you might conform to just be you! A liberated masculinity is about being yourself and it not being any less than other men's. We are not all identical men we are all unique and our own men. You like video games as an adult? That is cool! Gamers are cool! Also, hells yes they can be manly as fuck! Like the odd stage play? That does not make you any less masculine dude! Love pink? Then rock it and fuck those that knock it! You are not effete for loving a certain color.

Do you actually like the odd romance story? Guess what, still masculine! There is a definite meaning behind being effeminate and none of these match it. There is a definite meaning behind being manly and none of this removes that. There is a definite definition to being a man and none of this defiles that in a person. Do you occasionally cross your legs? Oh well, so what? You could cross your legs and sound like a quarterback when you speak. Hell, you could be a quarterback for all anyone else knows.

A liberated masculinity is just that; embracing that you are masculine that is beautiful and that you can be yourself while being masculine. It is not as feminists would like men being like women or men feminizing themselves. It is a man neither sacrificing his masculinity and manliness, nor sacrificing the little things that make him him to the fact he is masculine. It is an non-sacrificial view. One does not become emasculated by being an individual while being a man. For example; the non-feminine and masculine musical lover. (Yes, they do exist.) He would not feel the need to tame his swagger to his knowing all the songs from Cats or Phantom Of The Opera. Nor does he sacrifice his love for musical theater to the fact he has a swagger not a mince.

It is an individualistic masculinity that is neither sacrificing the masculine in a man nor sacrifices their personal loves and interests to their broader masculine identity. You can be masculine and know every show tune off by heart. There is a difference between loving a musical and emasculating yourself. This does not mean any man that loves a musical is masculine. Of course not there are lots of men that like musicals that are in fact effeminate to the point of being like a purse with balls. This does not mean because you like musicals you become that though. I am not arguing all men are masculine or manly;  they are not. I am arguing that you do not lose your manly card because of personal interests.

Nor am I arguing here that men whom are not manly and masculine should be somehow shamed to be something they are not. Anymore than I think us masculine and manly men should be pushed to be more effete. Liberated masculinity is about accepting ourselves; we are the men that are naturally masculine. The men that have masculinity as part of the very core of our gender identity and expression. Men such as ourselves need to be liberated from both our own inner insecurities and also the pressures of the outside world that say "masculinity is fragile, or masculinity is toxic." It is manliness and masculinity unleashed in all its positive glory on the world. In a liberated and positive state of living a joyous life of amazing moments and memories; built on value.

You could also be a masculine man that would not be caught dead doing a single non-stereotypical thing. Not having a single preferences or interest outside of the most stereotypical idea of being a man. Guess what that too is beautiful, amazing and a positive force in this world. You too can be a liberated man even if you are stereotypical. This is not about whether you do or do not. It is about unleashing the beauty of masculinity on the world confidently and filled with self-love. Filled with self-acceptance that a "perfect ideal man" is an illusion and in fact "you are a perfect man as you are." You do not need to meet some checklist of being this or that to be a good man, a great man and a perfect man just as you are.

Masculinity and manliness is beautiful; it is in so many men and repressed needs to come out in a positive and good way. A liberated way that does not mean men trying to be perfect and treating themselves like a utility. Like I always says we are men and not machines. We need to be able to recognize our humanity and not think that means to cut off our balls and be like women. Just be yourself that is what it all comes down to. If you have even the smallest inkling of a masculine side let it out, do not repress it and just be yourself. For you are beautiful! You are amazing.. You are perfect just the way you are and you need to know this. Masculinity is beautiful and it is good! It is in fact perfect!! Completely perfect! Love life, enjoy life, and enjoy being a man! You are an amazing outcome of evolution! Recognize it! Love it! Embrace it! Be it!

The Atlas Society and wavering on Reason

Recently I watched a lecture done by the new CEO of The Atlas Society which is the prominent "Open" Objectivism think tank. In it she did say somethings I thought was very wise and astute. About why people reject objectivism and misunderstand Rand on various issues. Much of what was said I totally agreed with, but, one thing stung badly. One of the questions was on loving Ayn Rand and God. Being an Objectivist and being a believer in a deity? The obvious answer is no! Objectivism is an atheistic moral philosophy due to using reason as a guide and not "faith or whim wishing feelings." You cannot be a person with objectivist moral philosophy and still believe in God.

There is no way to be an Objectivist and not be also an atheist by definition. This is not something to be argued over by Open Oists and the idea that it was brought up at all was blood boiling. There can be no wavering on reason and this is especially important the more we find out about our wet wear and evolutionary psychology. Wavering on reason means giving into instincts not honed in the modern day. Which often are out to lunch with reality. This is why we need to have both reason and emotion working together not as enemies of each other. For one without the other is dead in the water. 

This is something that has been pointed out in the past when the dangers of an open view of Objectivism have been raised by the likes of "Philosophy In Action," a radio show on reason in your life. The idea that this CEO did not bitch slap the idea down right away is to show they had some merit to their arguments. You do not need to agree or be an objectivist to understand it to be a Closed philosophy and not something open to be added to. It is meant to be part of all great and true philosophy not the whole truth and nothing, but, the truth over all else. Objectivism is Objectivism, A is A, and reality is reality. No deities can be combined with any other part of Objectivism or it is no longer Objectivism it is something else entirely!

Libertarians are at civil war and it all goes back to the importance of moral philsophy and ideas.

I came across an article last night with detailed how John McAfee and Daryl W. Perry were refusing to vote for Gary Johnson for president. This has caused quite a stir in the Libertarian Party in the US. It has caused these folks to be trashed and denounced for hurting the cause. For caring more about themselves than the "movement." For themselves than the spreading of liberty. Something I find quite ironic considering that all the Libertarian Party is supposed to require is agreeing with the philosophy of libertarianism. The last time I checked libertarianism was an individualistic philosophy. 

Of course; this could be seen as something foreshadowed in the debates for the presidential nominee for the party. As Gary Johnson was the most middle of the road person out of all of the choices. His VP is so moderate he is hardly libertarian really and he is only slightly more libertarian leaning. Gary Johnson is s better choice than Trump or Hillary for sure, but, he lacks a grounding in the philosophy that is concrete and not just abstract. For example; his views on not letting bakers refuse gay wedding cakes is authoritarian and not libertarian.

Objectivists often argue that without a concrete grounding libertarians let in too much unprincipled people in the name of a big tent. While there is staunch venom that will sometimes come from objectivists towards anyone that even uses the label libertarian they sometimes do have a point. Even if said individual objectivists make the rest of the objectivists look dogmatic. The argument is that politics without moral philosophy first leads to an abstraction that is too open to the point of being useless. Too much of a big tent lets anyone in at all and not just actual liberty folks.

The truth is that libertarianism has a moral viewpoint a philosophy if you will despite them often claiming there is not. Their need to distance themselves from objectivists in having an actual philosophy or ideology makes them back off even the most important core of a freedom philosophy. Whether you are an objectivist, libertarian, or a radical for capitalism. All of them are housed on the same concrete. That is the non-initiation of coercion, force, zero aggression principle. Which is a moral philosophy! It is an ideology in the best and most wonderful definition of the word.

The thing that links all Capitalists together is the NAP/NIFP/NICP/ZAP or "as long as you harm none the government leaves you alone." This is due to us all needing to be able to think for ourselves and make decisions free of coercion from others on our mind or our body. Or we are not free we are serfs, we are slaves and we are chattel. It is because we own our minds and bodies that we get to own our external property as well. Gary Johnson is no libertarian and neither is his VP. He is an ex-Republican that simply switched parties while continuing to be in the uncentered center, the muddled middle and half poison moderate.

For those whom did not know consider this my coming out on this Manhood blog as me being on The Right. I am hell of not a moderate, in the middle nor the uncentered center. I am of The Right, and I am right. I have the right view to a moral society to leave peaceful people alone. The Right is "the right" view for a truly prosperous, free and civilized society. Theocracy and Fascism which is often considered on the right is in fact both extreme Left ideologies which do not honor people's private use, obtaining and maintaining of their own property. One in the name of a fake idol called God and the other a false idol called Government or The State.

Libertarians abandoning being of The Right makes them no longer libertarian as they are no longer for liberty as they are no longer part of the broader Freedom Philosophy. Gary Johnson is better than Trump or Hillary, but, he is still not "the right" choice. Austin Peterson as much as I am not a fan is much more within the freedom philosophy. OK, I am going to say it, there is no left libertarian, there is no moderate libertarian, there is no center libertarian. You leave The Right and you are not libertarian you are not for liberty you are for small amounts of poison seeping into a healthy body of philosophy and only The Left wins. Only the State wins.

You are of The Right or you are just wrong; dead wrong and economically ignorant. There is nothing else, but, The right that is right. You do not need to be a libertarian, or an objectivist or a radical for capitalism. However, you are of The Right if you think all peaceful people should be left alone. You are of The Right and right morally if you are for leaving people alone whom are not harming others. You cannot want to admit it, but, pro-peace is pro-The Right. OK, there I said it, I am of the Right.
I am not ashamed in fact I am proud of my rightness. If you have issues with that fuck off!

If you need more understanding of The Right vs The Left I recommend a few things to check out;

https://www.theobjectivestandard.com/2012/06/political-left-and-right-properly-defined/
https://www.theobjectivestandard.com/2016/07/liberal-right-vs-regressive-left-and-religious-right/ 
http://www.justrightmedia.org/BROADCASTS-2013/20130912-justRIGHT-317-LEFTnRIGHT-justRIGHT-Syria.mp3 
http://kentforliberty.com/zap.html
https://www.zeroaggressionproject.org/mental-lever/zero-aggression-principle/


Here is the thing though I am not going to be dick to you if you are more leftist than me. I will not respect your political or economical or even your morals possibly, but, I will not treat you like an ass. I am after all, all about being a man of value and the right will do better to show we are for trading value for value by living that way. Show people what capitalists are really like by living as a person whom is great. Be a capitalist trading value for value using the trader principle. Show people how wonderful capitalism and voluntarily ran life is VS authoritarianism is. Lead by example and not crushing people like a bully. Be the Great Guy Alpha Beast and not the small scared bully!

Contra the transtrenders: Sorry, not sorry there really are only 2 genders and toddler style breakdowns do not change the truth!

I decided I just had to chime in on this whole trans-trending bullshit that is going on lately. I have had about enough of these people whom have no idea about biology or psychology 101 for animals spouting their bullshit. No, I do not care whom I make cry or whom I cause to be "triggered." You are either male or female, that is it there is only 2 genders. You either have a male body/brain combination, or a female body/brain combination or a serious mental/medical condition called Gender Dysphoria. Those are the three things that exist only those 3. There is no third or fourth genders; that is a person with a serious, very serious medical/mental condition and not a new gender.

Transsexualism or transgender-ism is a serious, and I mean serious medical/mental health issue. It is not someone whom wants to wear dresses when they have a penis. It is someone whom literally is Dysphoric of their body based on their gender. It is a DSM-5 recognized Mental Health Issue, it is not "normal." OK, it is a very serious condition for those whom have it. The entire premise of it relies on their only being 2 genders as well. For if there were not then a transsexual, trans-gendered person would not need to transition or take hormones. For there would be no need to do either thing. 

Sorry, but, anyone whom claims to be Non-Binary as in neither male nor female is full of shit. There is no such thing as having no gender. You have one; we all do. For most people; the vast majority that is aligned with your genitalia. If you do not identify you have a mental/medical condition you are not a new gender. This could be actual gender dysphoria or some other gender identity related disorder that might not be the same thing, but, have similar symptoms. It could be something that needs transitioning. Or it could be purely something that needs lots of intensive therapy. Both things happen and it could go either way. 

However, if you claim to not be either gender and ALSO as these bastards are doing claim NOT to have gender dysphoria you are full of shit. Or you have some other GID, Gender-Identity Disorder or Discordance and just do not want to admit it. You are either one of two things; also having a serious mental/medical issue and denying it causing you harm. Or you are lying and you are just delusional. Yes, some people are just delusional and these people are them. Gender is not a spectrum OK! It just is not. It is binary like a computer's memory it is male or female.. it is binary. You can express that in many different ways, but, expression is not the same as gender identity! Although the two can be linked! 

I do not care how "triggered" you are from human biology this is just the facts of nature. Men (discounting Gender Dysphoric people) have penises and women vaginas. This is tied together in most men and women with different brains, differences in hormones and their flow, and so much more. It is tied to a lot of things and it is not socially constructed it is biologically constructed. Even the cultural aspects are the results of biological decisions that kept our species going and exist for a reason. Evolutionary Psychology explains it all; both the nature and nurture aspects worked together to keep our species alive. 

This is where gender roles come from as well; they are not invented by the patriarchy or some nonsense. They are evolutionary constructs and can be seen even in the smallest of children. For example newborn male babies look at things not people. While newborn females look at people; this is biological and physiological occurring way before any cultural influences. Female babies exposed to abnormal levels of hormones also do this like baby boys do. The vice versa same for newborn baby boys with abnormal hormones in the womb. Indicating proof positive there is two hardwired genders; even if there are many individuals that differ within the same gender. There are only two; hardwired genders and not a gazillion. 

If you express yourself differently that is not the same as having a different gender. That is not the same thing as not being male or female. That is not same thing as being a non-binary douche. That is what you are a douche that wants to be a special snowflake because just being a person of an actual gender that is different in some manor you need to trash your own gender. To the point of claim to be no gender because to admit you are male or female, but, oh my god an individual is just too fucking old fashioned and conservative for you. Too traditionalist or even "oppressive." You people make me sick! Actual gender identity issues are a serious matter and you make all trans people look like they are just whiny babies. Not suffering an actual mental health issue. 

You are not a Ze, or a Zirk these are not real words nor are they "gender pronouns." We have two pronouns that are real, "him, and "her," or "he," or "she." They, them, zirk, zeeg, arl, erk, and whatever the fuck else you make up is just that made up trash. It should not be taken as seriously at all. On top of it stop demanding people use proper pronouns when you do not even use real pronouns. How is someone supposed to know when you are biologically one gender or another that you are a "ze?" It is bullshit, complete, total and utter. Quit whining about being misgendered because someone properly identifies your actual gender that you have. 

There is nothing other than men and women; women and men. Whether CIS and concordant like most humans or Trans and discordant. There are only two things you can be, psychologically, biologically, reproductive, chromosomal, there are two. Male or female and nothing else! You might be unique, but, you are not a new gender. You probably are not all that unique either you are probably more typical to a man or woman than you even realize. You are just an individual and not a label; which is not a bad thing. Men exist, women exist and that is it! You are one of them! Quit being a douche. 

Forging a path to a personally liberated manhood and a liberated masculinity.

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us.

I have been doing a lot of meditation this weekend and also sleeping a lot as well. Tomorrow is Monday and I will be back to work once more. I am embracing my true self; which is the powerful and amazing man that is Christopher Murphy once again lately. I am turning from worrying over stupid things and be ensnared in a cage within myself. I have been liberating myself once more to be myself the most me I can be. Learning to relax once more and just live life the best it can be.

I am liberating myself once more to be the most Christopher I can be without resistance. This is me; and me is a beautiful and powerful work of masculine art! I am an amazing and articulate man. I am smart, funny, sexy, sweet (not a Mr. nice guy though), and can be assertive when needed. I am a great man I can trust myself. Completely; I can trust myself completely. For I am a very high valued positive force in the world.

I have not felt anxious since Thursday night and that is a good thing. I have been relaxed all weekend and been basking in just living. Basking in just being Christopher Murphy and gracing the world with my presence. My being is a beautiful, magnificent and gorgeous man of a man! I am free to be me because "me, "I," is an awesome, powerful and majestic masculine being of tremendous worth! I have nothing to fear in the world from just being me at all times and in all things. To be a liberated man possessing a liberated masculinity.

My manhood is mine and mine alone. Only I can live this manhood and no other man. For only I can live this life as me. I am liberated to be free to think, feel and act my own way. While still not being any less manly than I am. For everything I do I do manly. For I am a liberated man, a very manly as fuck liberated masculinity. All I owe any others is basic decency and non-initiation of coercion. Not everyone will like me. Not everyone will be able to take this beacon of masculinity in all his glory. Some will hate me because they are jealous. Others will be blind to the beauty that I am. However, their blindness says nothing about me and my worth.

This does not mean that I am liberated "From Masculinity," as feminists and other misandric groups would like, but, the total opposite. I am in fact liberated in my masculinity, my manliness and my self-love/pride. I will never ever stop being masculine for others for it is at the core of me. However, masculinity does not equal being chained to needing to be some best of the best man. Nor does it mean that I am less manly because I am still single. I do not need to be in a relationship or getting pussy left and right to be masculine, and manly. A man's manliness, masculinity and value does not come from women. It comes from within ourselves first and foremost.

I am liberated in my masculinity because loving 50 Shades does not make me any less manly. Nor does having the Gideon Cross series of novels either. Nor does having Pink glasses or anything like that. Watching Murder She Wrote and not Rambo on the weekend does not equal being effete. I have said it before and I will say it again. These things are meaningless to being a man, to being masculine and/or to being a being a man of value. I walk, talk, sit (even if I did still cross my legs like I did when I was younger) and have sex like a man.

More men need to take a liberated masculinity mindset on life. Liberated from needing to be perfect to be manly. Free to be just the best us and to see us as being perfect just as we are. Manliness is not perfection and perfection is an illusion. The most manly thing you can do is love yourself as you are and not give a fuck what anyone wants or thinks of you. Manliness is making yourself the core of your world; followed by those you make your high values in life. I love the man in the mirror and I love this body I see. I love the mind behind the head between my ears. I will say it again and again.

Loving me is the most manly thing I can do. The most important thing is to love myself first before anything else. Love and embracing my inner fire in this man comes first and foremost. I love me! I love Christopher Matthew Murphy! I am me and I am free! I will not stand down in this! The world is mine and my oyster. I will not go softly into the good night! I will strive and thrive on. For I am more than enough and I am more than worthy. I am liberated to be me and be all that I am. To be all that I can be. Instead of striving for perfection always being perfectly, authentically me at all times.