Born Again Christian; Biblical Fundamentalist, King James Only, Dispensational and libertarian
Wednesday, April 22, 2026
What is Christian Paleolibertarianism
Christian Paleolibertarianism is a school of thought within American libertarianism founded by Lew Rockwell and Murray Rothbard, and closely associated with the Ludwig von Mises Institute. It is based on a combination of radical libertarianism in politics and cultural conservatism in social thought. Austrian economics, anti-federalism, Misesian libertarianism, and anarcho-capitalism heavily influenced the movement’s attitudes toward ideas on trade, commerce and statecraft.
“Paleolibertarianism holds with Lord Acton that liberty is the highest political end of man, and that all forms of government intervention — economic, cultural, social, international — amount to an attack on prosperity, morals, and bourgeois civilization itself, and thus must be opposed at all levels and without compromise. It is ‘paleo’ because of its genesis in the work of Murray N. Rothbard and his predecessors, including Ludwig von Mises, Albert Jay Nock, Garet Garrett, and the entire interwar Old Right that opposed the New Deal and favored the Old Republic of property rights, freedom of association, and radical political decentralization. Just as important, paleolibertarianism predates the politicization of libertarianism that began in the 1980s, when large institutions moved to Washington and began to use the language of liberty as part of a grab bag of ‘policy options.’ Instead of principle, the neo-libertarians give us political alliances; instead of intellectually robust ideas, they give us marketable platitudes. What’s more, paleolibertarianism distinguishes itself from left-libertarianism because it has made its peace with religion as the bedrock of liberty, property, and the natural order.” – Lew Rockwell
Paleolibertarianism advocates for a more restrictive immigration policy compared to traditional libertarian views, emphasizing the rights of property owners to control who enters their land. This perspective argues that unrestricted immigration can undermine individual liberty and cultural integrity.
Paleolibertarianism combines conservative cultural values with libertarian opposition to government intervention, aiming to unite libertarians and paleoconservatives. It emphasizes free markets, traditionalism, and anti-interventionism, while opposing protectionism and modernist cultural trends.
https://www.mapmypolitics.org/ideology/paleolibertarian.html
https://polcompball.wiki/Paleolibertarianism
https://rothbardrockwellreport.substack.com/p/why-paleo
https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Paleolibertarianism
https://everything.explained.today/Paleolibertarianism/
https://www.paleolibertarian.com/sample-page/
https://rothbardrockwellreport.substack.com/p/the-case-for-paleolibertarianism
https://8values.cc/blog/paleolibertarianism
https://spreadgreatideas.substack.com/p/paleolibertarian-understand-the-basics
Tuesday, April 21, 2026
Fundamentalism VS Legalism
I am a Christian Fundamentalist as I am totally opposed to Modernism and False Gospels of liberal theology. I refuse to compromise on the fundamentals of true Christianity. Fundamentalism as I am using the term is a 20th-century anti-modern/liberal orthodox Christian movement. This definition is drawn from the history of the movement, from its inception in the early part of the 20th-century until the present.
To understand fundamentalism one must first understand its opponent: theological liberalism or modernism. The core of liberalism is its reliance on experience over doctrine. Thus the liberal will maintain that the Bible is not necessarily true doctrine but merely information about people’s experience with God. A liberal will appeal to the individual experience of a Christian as the basis of authority. The power of liberalism comes from its use of Christian language with a new definition. Since they reject the objective truth and rely on experience, then words such as ‘salvation,’ ‘Christ,’ and ‘resurrection’ are not taken from the Bible but redefined in a subjective or modern sense. This new definition is formed using modern principles of criticism, science, and philosophy. Thus liberalism is an experience-based theology, that rejects the inerrancy of Scripture in favor of subject personal relationships and modern scientific methods. Though some would define it differently, to do so would reject the writings and arguments of the vast majority of fundamentalists over the past century.
To understand fundamentalism is to place it in its proper context, namely 20th-century America. Fundamentalism’s anti-modernist nature necessitates that there exist modernism for it to oppose. Thus before the late 1800s and early 1900s fundamentalism could not exist because liberalism did not exist, at least not as a movement or theology. To attempt to find fundamentalism in the centuries prior is impossible, though you may find individual aspects of it, such as doctrinal purity or separatism. Only when Christianity was mixed with modern methods of science, history, and theology would there be a need for a group to oppose it. This is the movement we call fundamentalism.
The most basic aspect of fundamentalism is its adherence to the inerrancy of Scripture. This can be defined as a belief in the inspiration of the Scriptures by God that completely rules out any possible error in the transmission, so that what the writers penned on paper was completely true: doctrinally, historically, and scientifically. This view is not a strictly fundamentalist view, as other conservative denomination and groups have also ascribed to it, but it is an essential part of its doctrine. Along with the inspiration of Scripture, fundamentalists hold to six other doctrines.
1) Inerrancy of Scriptures
2) Virgin Birth
3) Christ’s Substitutionary Atonement
4) Christ’s Bodily Resurrection
5) The Second Coming of Christ
6) Dispensational Theology based on a Literal Grammatical Historical view of Scriptures.
(A dispensationalist view was rejected by J. Gresham Machen, leader of Presbyterian Fundamentalism, and Williams Jennings Bryan, who fought evolution in the Scopes Monkey Trial. However, if the Scripture is taken in its plane sense one will come to dispensational theology.)
7) Biblical Creationism (Literal Six Days of Creation in Genesis some 6000 yrs. ago, today called Young Earth Creationism.)
The guiding principle in fundamentalist thought is that the inerrant Bible is foundational to knowledge, and that modernism, with its accompanying ideas of subjectivism, Darwinism and higher criticism, is to be rejected.
The final mark of fundamentalism is its willingness to separate from liberalism. This was evidenced in various leaders of the movement: Machen left Princeton and founded Westminster Theological Seminary, J. Frank Norris left (or was kicked out) of the Southern Baptist Convention, John R. Rice separated from the Southern Baptist Convention and then later from Billy Graham when he associated with liberals. While these men did not categorize these groups as liberal, they believed that they were tolerant of such, and thus separated to defend doctrinal purity.
I am a Christian Fundamentalist of the most pronounced type. So should you be one my fellow Born Again Christian.
“Fundamentalism (in so far as consistent Biblical Theology is meant by this term) is in principle nothing but Christianity itself.”
“‘Fundamentalism’ is the only consistently thought-out version of the faith, and the ‘Fundamentalist’ is the only Christian who uses his mind in a fully Christian way.” —J. I. Packer
“The deepest cleavages in Christendom are doctrinal; and the deepest doctrinal cleavages are those which result from disagreement about authority.”
“Sham unity is not worth working for, and real unity, that fellowship of love in the truth which Christ prayed that His disciples might enjoy, will come only as those sections of the wall which rest on unsound foundations are dismantled and rebuilt.” —J. I. Packer
People use the term “fundamentalist” in a disparaging sense because of a handful of bad apples who abuse the title At its core, fundamentalism is about nothing more than getting back to fundamental tenets and beliefs of Christianity, following what the Bible says.
“‘Fundamentalism’ is the only consistently thought-out version of the faith, and the ‘Fundamentalist’ is the only Christian who uses his mind in a fully Christian way.” —J. I. Packer
“The deepest cleavages in Christendom are doctrinal; and the deepest doctrinal cleavages are those which result from disagreement about authority.”
“Sham unity is not worth working for, and real unity, that fellowship of love in the truth which Christ prayed that His disciples might enjoy, will come only as those sections of the wall which rest on unsound foundations are dismantled and rebuilt.” —J. I. Packer
People use the term “fundamentalist” in a disparaging sense because of a handful of bad apples who abuse the title At its core, fundamentalism is about nothing more than getting back to fundamental tenets and beliefs of Christianity, following what the Bible says.
Legalism is the strict adherence to laws or rules, often in a religious context, where individuals believe that they can earn salvation or favor with God through their obedience to these laws. It is generally viewed negatively, as it emphasizes human effort over grace and faith.
Legalism exists when people attempt to secure righteousness in God’s sight by good works. Legalists believe that they can earn or merit God’s approval by performing the requirements of the law. A legalist believes that their good works and obedience to God affects their salvation. Legalism focuses on God’s laws more than relationship with God. It keeps external laws without a truly submitted heart.
Our salvation starts and ends with faith in the atoning sacrifice Christ made for us on the cross. Ephesians 2:8-9 says, “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God — not by works, so that no one can boast.”
This is good news for everyone. Galatians 3:10-11 reminds us, “For all who rely on the works of the law are under a curse, as it is written: ‘Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law.’ Clearly no one who relies on the law is justified before God, because ‘the righteous will live by faith.’”
Fundamentalism and legalism should never be mistaken for each other or somehow combined to become a false gospel of some sort. A Fundamentalist believes in salvation through Grace alone, by faith alone, in Christ alone to the Glory of God alone. It is simple faith; changing your mind, belief on Christ and what He has done for us all on the Cross of Calvary that true Biblical Fundamentalists preach not legalism and good works. Realizing your sinful nature and believing On Christ is The Gospel not legalism.
Dr Gary Mann – The KJV Only Tag What it Does & Does Not Mean
I disagree with one part in this video in which he seems to call modern version users heretical for not using The King James Bible. I do not consider non KJV brethren or sisters to be heretics.
However, I do think they are not using the most accurate translation if they do not use a Textus Receptus based Bible.
I also think that we should be still using the KJV as English Speaking Christians or an updated version of it such as the Simplified or Easy Reader King James. However, I am fine compromising and going with the NKJV as it is least a TR/Majority Manuscripts based Bible.
I do not judge non KJV Christians as less than or anything. Nor do I agree as some KJV brethren do that I need to separate from non KJV brethren. However, I am KJV Only myself and will keep using the Good Old King James.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)