No, Donald Trump Flag burning should NOT be criminalized! It is called Freedom of Speech!

Sorry, Mr. President, but, burning flags is defended by this little concept called freedom of speech and expression. It is defended by the 1st Amendment right you as a Republican nominee is supposed to defend under the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America. You do not get to throw a fucking hissy fit when you are offended by speech. You are acting no better than the rioters whom are rioting you if you think it is OK to go after the free speech of people that want to say something you disagree with.

You do not get to dictate the removal of the cornerstone of the Republic because you are an elected Republican president. It is your elected duty as a Republican to defend the 1st amendment of the constitution just like all of the other bills of rights. You made an entire campaign on being against political correctness and what do you end up doing? Being just as afraid of being offended as the Social Justice Warriors. You are claiming to be a Republican and you dare consider yourself an Alpha Male.

Alpha Males do not care what other people are doing as long as they keep their hands to themselves. They do not try and squash other peoples rights. They if anything do not give a shit what other people think. Oh, Mr. President you are being a Beta Cuck crybaby ALA a Male feminist. Whining and complaining because something offends you makes you a try hard phony not an Alpha Male. It started with your calling out the Hamilton stuff. Now it is the flag and what happens to it. For such a strong man you are sure acting like a weak little boy.

Grow some fucking skin and let your balls drop again.. if they ever did yet to begin with. You are more and more looking like a poor excuse of a leader of the Free World. You are slowly losing lots of support with this sort of stunt. Man the fuck up for fucks sake! You are like 70 fucking years old you need to act your fucking age! Not your shoe size! Words and peaceful demonstrations are not something to be afraid of. Nor are they something to interfere in!

This real and true alpha is not happy with your performance so far in your elected post. If you decide to legally act on this garbage and go after the 1st amendment you can suck on my Alpha male cock! And don't you dare spit either! I do not defend the rioters and looters, but, I do not defend you infringing on people's rights either. Mr. Trump you are now President Cuck Elect if you go through with this. Freedom of speech trumps your Trump feels you little pussy! 

Keep a proper attitude it makes all the difference!!

Fuck you #TransLivesMatter!!!! ALL LIVES MATTER!!! ALL LIVES!!!

This habit of making collective groups lives matter over individual lives is starting to become sickening. First it was #BlackLivesMatter and the real world rioting insanity with even killing of cops. Now there is a movement to make #TransLivesMatter starting with this month being Trans Awareness Month. Or should I say last month was it is over now. This is bullshit! This is bullshit!

Individuals human lives matter and it does not matter your orientation, or gender. People do not get to have their deaths matter more because they died having Gender Identity Dysphoria and transitioning for it. Just like Black Lives Matter is bullshit this too is bullshit. All lives matter and not just a select few of the human species. It is horrid to think that anyone would collectivize away individual rights to life.

All lives matter and it does not matter your particular little group you are in. Trans people do not get special magical superiority over the rest of us simply because they have been killed. If you add up the total amount of transgendered people killed VS the amount of the majority killed in the USA it pales in comparison due to how small the actual amount of trans humans is in general. All lives matter people all of them and yes trans people dying is not nice, but, this is the real world where murder exists towards all individuals regardless of gender or gender identity.

There will never be a world where no gays, no lesbians, no straights, no anyone does not get killed. We live in a world with ability to die at the hands of another person this is real life. It is statistically rarer than ever these days, but, it will always happen. We will never live in a heaven on Earth where death and destruction does not exist it is impossible for we are in the real world. Fuck you #TransLivesMattter; all of our lives matter and you do not get to be special snowflakes because you are Trans.

I am more Republican than President Elect Trump

Republicanism is defined as being for a Constitutional Republic with certain checks and balances. Which contains lots of ways of watching the watchers and a very narrow defined role of the government. That role being specifically and historically the national and domestic defense; cops, courts and a military. Using this definition I am a Republican and as Peter Thiel said at the Trump rallies I am proud to be one. I defend a limited government/state as the only moral one that can exist.

I also considered myself to be a lowercase libertarian (as opposed to an upper case member of any Libertarian political party.) As well as understanding of and supporting of Objectivism. These ideas are not in conflict. One can be both a Republican and a libertarian. Just like one can be an Objectivist and Republican. In fact all Objectivism is Republican as all Objectivists support a limited government which is a republic of sorts. That does not mean all Republics in this world are Constitutionally limited governments.

I am defining Republic in this description as only within the spectrum in which Republic means limited constitutional government. Trump is not one he is in favor of all kinds of government programs; such as NSA and The Patriot Act that are completely antithetical of a constitutional republic and a separation of powers with checks/balances. Not too mention he is OK with raising the minimum wage. He now supports possibly Climate Change legislation and is not repealing Obamacare after all. He is also going back on going after Hillary Clinton. He has no principles and he is showing this. Republicanism is principled defense of liberty and limited government. I would be a better Republican President than Trump and I am Canadian!

Trumps Victory is not a Victory for the Right.

I want to start by saying I am not someone whom thinks the world is coming to an end due to Trump being elected president. At the same time I am not a Trump demagogue whom thinks he is the best thing to happen to America either. I am in the middle appreciating some of the ideas he wants to go with and loathing others. I am at heart a positive and optimistic man even in the face of The Trump leading the USA. I want to also say I am not blind to his authoritarian side nor to the authoritarians surrounding him. However, I have hope that the Senate, House Republicans that did not agree with him will fight him tooth and nail. 

Even with this sense of life and optimism I am not blind to the fact this is not a victory for the rightists among us. Trump is a Classic Old-School Leftist anti-free trade and protectionist Democrat. He was what a Democrat was say 20 or 30 years ago and his views on protectionism are more in line with Hillary's rival Bernie Sanders than any mainstream Republicans. This was a win for the Old-School fraction of the left-wing and not a triumph for the secular, pro-reason and capitalist right. This was not a win for Classical Liberalism, Constitutional Republicans, Laissez-faire or libertarians, nor Objectivists. 

While Trump ran on cutting taxes, regulations and repealing Obamacare. He has already began to back peddle and show he really is not concerned with making a more limited government in accordance with the US Constitution and classical liberal principles the cornerstone of the Right. Let alone being a fan of anything near the most Radical of the freedom movement those whom call for stateless liberty. While I am not an an-cap the fact that some An-Caps are supporting him boggles the mind it really does. He has an authoritarian streak that we all need to watch out for. Especially those whom want freedom. 

He has not met any of his promises so far to cut the government down to size and I am hoping that turns around once he begins government. He has reneged in advance on so many promises and my hope in him is slowly waning despite my optimism because of this. I am not going to say he is a horrible person as some have said. I think he is misinformed and ignorant, wrong on a lot of things, but, he is not some evil devil. We need to be weary of him and his aids. We need to watch the direction the government flows. I highly doubt it will be to the genuine right, but, in a weird middle ground. Combining some elements that will be authoritarian with other elements of certain freedoms. 

I refrain any righties to stop saying we won we have not. Nor should we join the rioting nutcases in the streets. He has won fair and square, but, we can still give our voice to the voiceless in the Rational, secular and capitalist right. We have not won whether it is my fellow atheist righties or other secular believers on the right. We have not won and we should not forget this and give into some collectivism over Trump. Collectivism is the real enemy ideology we must fight. This is individualism and individuals vs collectivism and collectivizing people like some Borg. We must remember that is the real foundation to liberty!

 

 

A little bit on my views on the War on Terror.

I think Trump actually had a good idea when he said in his campaign we should stop all immigration from Countries affiliated with groups and ideologies in league with Radical Islam. Not permanently, but, until we have a much better vetting and screening process. As a freedom person I bet you expected me to be a pussy when it comes to the whole War on Terror, but, I am not a pacifist. NAP is not pacifism and I fully consider Islam a real threat governments need to be fighting.

We have been in a War with Islam within the West since the Iranian Hostage situation with the US in the 1970's. That is really when this all began not on 9/11. 9/11 was just one of the most horrendous moments in it. This is an old war really, but, it was not talked much about until 9./11 and it got its own name. The war on Terror, which is a ridiculous name. It is in fact the War with Islam and it always has been. My views are contrary to many libertarians on this issue and the nature of this threat. It is a serious threat akin to the Nazis and WWII and we are not hardly even fighting. We are laying down letting the threat take us out little by little.

We need to do to the various Radical Islam ideology what we did back then. We need to eliminate the threat and yes that means lots of people will lose their life, but, the threat needs to be taken out completely, so, peace can come back. We need to do to Terrorists and their funding sources what we did to the Nazis. Take them out; first give the ultimatum and then no follow through we eliminate them. Yes, that means we need to give Iran an ultimate and then act on it if they do not stop funding terrorist groups. Yes, I mean threaten to attack and do so if they do not comply. Iraq was the wrong target it was not responsible for the terrorist threat, but, Iran is a major cause of it.

We also need to do the same thing with Saudi Arabia; give them an ultimatum to stop supporting Radical Islamic terrorism. If they do not comply well we also go after them too. Those are the real big funding sources of terrorism as well as where most of the propaganda comes from. It was not Iraq that the USA should have gone after. Afghanistan can be seen as a just retaliation to 9/11 to remove a threat. However, the hijackers were all Saudi's after all. In my opinion The West has not been too harsh on fighting Islam, but, not defending itself strong enough. Not being serious enough about eliminating the threat at its true sources. We also need to work on internal Radicals on a more serious level as well.

Yes, you heard me right we are not fighting the war strong enough. This is because we are not fighting wisely we keep choosing bad targets that do not need to be taken out. While over looking all of the legitimate targets we should be working towards dealing with and eliminating. We have been too altruistic and made it into a "War for spreading democracy." Into a "World Police," and it is not is it is a matter of self-defense against legitimate threat which needs to be eliminated. We should not care about spreading anything. We should only care about keeping The West and the citizens in the West safe from a threat. Doing what needs to be done to do that no matter how messy that might be in the process. We need to defend the innocent against these Radical killing machines at all costs.

I am not a warhawk that is wanting War for the sake of war. Not at all, but, Islamic Jihad is too much of a real and ever present threat akin to the Nazis that I cannot take a do nothing position like so many libertarians take. Once the threat is eliminated we will be able to have peace. However, you cannot have peace when we are in this situation that we are in right now. We need to eliminate the threats and be serious about it now, so, that we can have the peaceful Global Capitalist world all freedom lovers want for the future. Hell, once we eliminate the threats then maybe we can have those Open Borders libertarians love so much. However, not while we have a serious threat we have not yet eliminated.

What I agree on with the new Vice President Mike Pence

As I found myself researching more into the new VP Mike Pence I found some interesting things. Some of which was a little out there, but, other things were not so insane. Other things in fact I totally agreed with. The idea of privatizing Social Security absolutely I support. The fact that anti-discrimination laws are anti-religious liberty I agree with and would support a full repeal of all discrimination laws over the private sector. The idea of cutting taxing and regulations I agree with. The ending of Common Core I totally support.

The fact that hate crime laws are "thought crime" laws I completely agree with and would not have passed the Matthew Sheppard Act. Murder is murder, theft is theft you do not get charged more or should not based on the victim being GBLT. All crimes are acts of hate regardless of whom the target is and there is no need to have a separate level of crime based on if you harbor hateful ideas or not. It is the act of committing the crime that is charged and not that you are hating the victim or not. The existence of charter, home and other private schools are a must for a free society.

The idea of having money follow the person and being able to go to a charter or private school is a step in the right direction. I would go even further and not have any tax funded or state ran schools. We should have a free market in education with constant competition pushing the schools to achieve better and better quality education. There are a number of things mentioned on his Wiki that I do agree with. Hell, he even is pro-free trade and trade agreements. It is when you get to his views on GBLT folks that it begins to get a little darker.

He signed a bill related to funding going to conversion therapy for homosexuals. Which was not very nice to find out about, but, still it was for consenting adults that I saw. It was also not forced on the GBLT people in the area it was funding of a voluntary thing. He also was against same-sex marriage as well civil unions. He does also support pro-life views as well. Which depending on your opinion on abortion could be quite a road block. Myself I am very pro-life once the fetus gets to viability and from that point on I do think there needs to be a law against obtaining abortions outside of health of the mother or rape/molestation.

He also passed a bill wherein you cannot get an abortion if it is due to not wanting the race, sex, disability or orientation of the fetus. Which I also completely agree with; self-defense is not defined as defending against having the wrong type of baby. Wherein I disagree with him again is the issue of GBLT stuff and the fact he supported "don't ask don't tell." He also supported the Iraq War which I was not a fan of in anyway. We shall need to wait and see what things are like.