Manhood and masculinity exists minus women. If you call someone a cuck you promote a males as utilities view of men.

There is a growing word being used in the manosphere especially on YouTube when it comes to criticizing feminist men. It is the use of the word cuck which is short for cuckold. It basically means a man whom has his cock in a device while having to watch their female partner being banged by another man. It paints any man that is not getting women as being less of a man. A man that is not in a position where he is giving sexual pleasure to a woman he is not a man.

I find the use of such a word to be totally asinine for the manosphere. It makes it seem like men have no value when women are not involved. Do not worship at the lips of the vagina and you are not a man. Does this mean bisexual and homosexual men that do not give women pleasure are not men? That men that are going their own way (even if not associated with the MGTOW movement) are not real men? That masculinity and manhood does not exist as having its worth outside of women?

This is not helping men being looked at as more than utilities or boy toys for women's pleasure. It is not helping men be able to live their life as they see fit. As fully human men away from the need to please and do for women. Men need to be able to liberate themselves from needing to live for women. They need to learn to have themselves as their own mental point of origin. To live a life filled with their own virtues and values. To go towards their own happiness without needing to think about women as some huge hive mind they need to give a fuck about.

Men should be living for themselves and not for the need for sexual gratification or the need to be in a relationship with some woman. They need to be able to not be with women and be happy. They need to live not for women. but. for themselves and making their life the best that it can be. Men should not be called cuckold for being SJWs or feminists. As evil and I mean evil as both ideologies actually are. It does not mean people get to make it seem like men are defined by women in order to be men. Such an idea is insane and stupid. Masculinity is psychological and biological, and women can change nothing about that.

In fact, by being so concentrated on women as ones view on the world. So obsessed with pussy or needing a woman around is putting women you have not even and might never meet in charge of your happiness. As well as in charge of considering yourself a man. It is to suffer from grave shame for not meeting the requirement of getting laid or a girlfriend. It is all very men as utilities to others and it needs to stop. It is utter bullshit! Men need to stop making women the centre of their manworld and make their manworld centre on the man himself.. on them.

I am not emasculated and weak to admit I am vulnerable right now; to seek help.

Lately I have been having issues with my anxiety and depression. I was talking with my friend about this issue and she recommended that I go to a councilor about it. To get some therapy and some professional assistance. I would not be against getting professional help with my issues. However, under one circumstance. That is that the therapist is not some feminist trained accolade. The person would need to understand and acknowledge masculinity and men's issues.

They need to not try and get me to be more like a woman to help me. They need to help me embrace myself and all that I am. To embrace and accept my manhood and also accept/embrace their help as well. They need to not attempt to emasculate my person in order to help me with my issues. They need to accept that I be both vulnerable and also masculine. I am both vulnerable and a strong man. That my admitting vulnerability can be a strength and not a weakness.

I would not want to work with anyone that tried to brainwash me into being a feminist supporting idiot. I will only work with someone that understands men and my psychology. As well as someone that is not trying to help me by changing who I am as a person. Someone that will not make up BS about how this caused that or that caused this. Or to try to link my anxiety to being an MRA or anti-feminist. Or to being a person whom is in favor of the freedom philosophy.

As long as they do not use pseudio science and BS I will be more than happy to get assistance from a professional. I just would need to find one that I did find I could trust. One that does not try to change me and one that lets me be me. If I can find someone like that and my issues continue I will get professional help.

   

Women need to start helping to lessen the "empathy gap."

For those unaware there is a term going around the Interwebz and the manosphere called "the empathy gap." The idea that there is a gap between women and men when it comes to empathy. That women have their own selves as a primary. They have in-group preferences towards other women, but, lack empathy for what men go through. Which is something that one can see easily in this world. Thus the growing MGTOW and broader Men's Human Rights movements. 

The gap is real and one sees it a lot when they are a man. Women will seem empathetic at first, but, as soon as you need them to be the shoulder to lean on for you they will not care. They will rant about how you need to listen to their feelings and treat you like dirt. I have experienced this with pretty much any woman I have dated in the past. Tell them your needs and they do not give a fuck about you.

This is what has gotten me so considering going MGTOW and shrugging off women like the strike from "Atlas Shrugged." It is not easy, however, I like any man that likes women have to face my evolutionary psychology. That as a bisexual man I LOVE the opposite sex, LOVE in all capitals. It is not as some think MGTOW do not hate women. Many of us love women whom we have respect with and those NAWALT Unicorns when we find them. 

What we find disgusting is the way most women around treat most men around. With a lack of empathy for their issues. A lack of understanding what it means to be a man and what they go through in life. A lack of caring if a man is harmed, abused, emasculated, or otherwise treated like shit by women just for being a man. A lack of caring that men are considered monsters and women their victims. 

Men are not cared for when something horrible happens to them. One is not seen as fully human when you are a man. One sees it all the time; give someone a male victim and a female one only the female one will be thought of. Blame it on our Evo-Psychology that many women cling to their in group bias.Women need to start clinging to their evolved reason instead and help close the empathy gap with men. If they do not more and more men will say fuck you and just stop associating with women. 

 

Evo-Psychology is very real and explains a lot of things. To deny it is a modern day denial of human nature itself.

"Evolutionary psychology is a theoretical approach to psychology that attempts to explain useful mental and psychological traits—such as memory, perception, or language—as adaptations, i.e., as the functional products of natural selection."

Something becomes very clear the more you hear crazy ideas. That is that there is a vast swath of the population that is simply illiterate when it comes to human nature. Some people just need to cling to the bullshit idea that humans are blank slates and that evolutionary psychology is not accurate. People whom think rightfully so that creationism is bollocks actually treat the human brain like it has no link to the way we got here. Nor to our evolved past in general.

They utterly lack any idea of a logical conclusion on this matter. If we got to where we are through means of evolution in every other area of our body why would not our brain? Where else would our brain, any instincts, mating choices and so much more be from, but, evolution and biologically driven by evolutionary pressures. Including psychological adaptations; which come from that same evolved underwriting systems in male and female natures. As well as in human nature in general.

Evolutionary Psych is a very real science and not some BS excuse to separate women and men from each other. Male and female natures are different to each other, but, they are not opposites. They evolved to be complimentary, but, different and to have different sexual roles. Which through sexual dimorphism includes a great deal of what makes up the two genders and their sex roles. Males evolved to be females protectors, providers and traits that go with those roles.

This is why most men are the way they are and females have their own evolved traits as well. This is also where Gynoentrism and hypergamy comes from. It is what drives Social Justice Warriorism and ultimately the fucked up special snowflakes; especially the women. It is in turn men's natural nature to be protective and providing that helps push through feminism in the academia and the courts. What lets feminism pass all kinds of BS lies based on BS stories. Men want to believe women due to their hard-wiring.

Women too want to believe women based on their own female natures. Evolutionary psychology does not explain everything, but, it does explain a lot. The utter disregard of this science by so many of the manosphere claiming it is all cultural Marxism is inaccurate. What anti-feminists; whether Egalitarians or MGTOW, or what have you need to face is human nature. That what we need to do to deal with gynocentrism is to leverage our ability to reason and have self control. To make sure that we have things setup in a way in which we would adapt to a non-gynocentristic society.

I also see on the other hand some denying we have evolved adaptability, self-control, free-won't, free will, and/or any sense of reason. I find that just as disturbing as someone denying any other aspect of our psychology. Free will has evolved in our cognitive process just as much as instincts did. As long as you can chose not to listen to a desire. As long as you can have some sense of self-control and adapt to your environment you have a practical and reasonable version of free will. A non-magic brain biology form of free will.

Steven Pinker describes a biological basis for compatibilist freewill

Free Will is part of our Evolutionary Psychology and not against human nature

Earlier tonight I was listening to a podcast on YouTube from TL:DR about mating strategies, hypergamy, gynocentrism, female nature in general and male nature. As well as on how much is malleable or not. How much is changeable or not changeable? Or is there even anything to change? 

I found myself following along with these sorts of questions as I listened to the podcast. I actually have a controversial view on this topic. I do not think that male or female nature can change. Men are men and women are women. Some men and women have different types of brain wiring, but, overall we are what we are. However, that is a great thing because that includes the part of male and female nature known as free will. 

Men and women have the reality of that biologically evolved force called free will or as some would call it "reasonable self-control." We all have both evolved to have instincts in one part of our wiring and also the ability to adapt, and make decisions in that same evolutionary process. During the podcast it seemed to me that there was a continuing need to disprove free will. Or at least that is the way it seemed. It was more from the guest than TL;DR, but, it was coming through loud and clear.

They talked about if the nature was malleable or not, but, that is not something that matters. Our instincts could never change and free will/reason would still be there in that same evolutionary psychology. Evolutionary biology gives us a brain that is wired for some sense of adaptability. It is itself part of our male and female nature. The issues with most women is that they are not taught critical thinking and to reason like most men. Which means that girls grow up with instincts only and without working on ones ability to reason. 

It could also be that women do have to work harder to be as reasonable as a man. If so, this would be a fact of nature and of this same evolutionary psychology. What it does not do though is erase free will. It only means that women need to work twice as hard to be as reasonable as the average man. I find that the issue people have with evolutionary psychology about biological determinism is complete balderdash. Everything your brain is doing is doing something biologically your brain even if it was rewired is biologically changing. It is still a biological act. 

Our brain is our mind and it is us. Thus all this biological is 100% deterministic; as if fairly determined means something for sure will happen is again BS. The part of our biology which regulates reason and free will is there. One could even argue it is itself determined to be there as a biological and natural fact of human nature. So, where else would the things about us come from? Magic ether from the sky from some mystical Sky Daddy? No, from evolution by natural selection. Nowhere else!

Free will as we know it is real and must only be from one place. From our biology and nowhere else. So, what if biological determinism is real? Again, as long as free will is part of what is determined by biology. As long as we developed through evolution the least bit of self-control and the ability to choose we will be fine as a species. I know we have free will or at least choice. How? I could have chosen not to write this article and you chose not to read it. Or read it at a different time and do something else in this moment. That is all we need for the experience we call free will or choice to matter and be true!