I stand by that still, but, this is where not mistaking neolibertarian politics for the view of National Defense of classical libertarianism or even classical liberalism in its 19th century variety.
Turns out neolibertarians are in support of Israel and their ability to defend themselves. Just as they support a more hawkish National Defense at home in Canada and the USA.
This points to the importance of separation between neolibertarianism and classical libertarianism philosophy. I am not a libertarian I am staunchly neolibertarian there are big differences.
Things like this is why I do not tend to use the term libertarianism to define my views and do not want anything to do with most people in the liberty movement anymore. I am not a pacifist I am in favour of defensive force including preventative force when needed.
