Born Again Christian; Biblical Fundamentalist, Received Text-KJV, Dispensational

Born Again Christian; Biblical Fundamentalist, Received Text-KJV, Dispensational

Friday, March 31, 2023

John MacArthur, the Law of God, & The Boot

The Alcoholics Anonymous Cult & Addiction

Matthew 15:27 — The TR was not back-translated from the AV

My story of God's Amazing Grace in ones sexuality on this dauchery visibility day.

When I was 19 I began identifying as bisexual after my experiences being raped. I was literally groomed into the LGB community by influence of a cunning, well manipulating grooming of a bicurious sexual predator. 

When I got back to PEI I met yet another groomer and predator that was known for using, brainwashing and manipulating guys into the G and milking their new identity for all it was worth.

He struck when his prey was at his most vulnerable in my case when my first girlfriend had left me. I was brainwashed by a book as well. A book by the name of "Coming Out to yourself." A book that gets you to repeat to yourself you are gay in mirrors and such mind numbing things. Essentially self brainwashing. 

Having swallowed Keegan's Kool aid and also having brainwashed myself into thinking my experiences were indicative of being gay I began to affirm and live a gay life.

However, something was nagging in the back of my mind and there were numerous times I would imagine myself with a woman despite all the grooming and the continued affirmations of not being into the opposite sex.

So, I went from the G to the B once again, but, my sexuality was changing overtime. I was becoming no longer B either. Instead I was, by The Grace of God becoming totally heterosexual I became straight.

On my 30th Birthday I came out to a select group of trusted people as being neither B or G and not part of said community after all. I came out as Straight and 100% heterosexual. I am one of the many people whom had found themselves being heterosexual as I got into my 30s whom used identify as bisexual or homosexual. Through natural change overtime as we got older.

I am myself proof of the fluidity and flexibility nature of sexuality and that change from a GB to a heterosexual does happen and can happen. I am not alone by far most people in all large sized longitudinal studies of same sex attraction lose their attractions for opposite sex attraction overtime if not told to embrace their same sex attraction cross both of the sexes. Without any sort of therapeutic aspect of any kind.

This Is How Evolution Turned Our World into a Circus

Speak O Lord (Live from Sing!) - Keith & Kristyn Getty, Shane & Shane

Homosexuality and Transgender - Pastor Voddie Baucham

Tucker Carlson: Why Transgenderism HATES Christian Values!

Were We WRONG About the Tower of Babel?

Monday, March 27, 2023

Is God's Law Unjust, Unfair, and Past?

Refuting An Embarrassing Critique of God's Law

Responding to LGBT Brandan Robertson's Comments

Why I use the Authorized Version/King James Bible

I decided to make a post explaining why I use the Authorized Version/King James Bible as my main Bible translation. Lest you think I hate other versions I do not. I used the NKJV for quite some time as my sanctuary Bible. I also have used the MEV and ESV for my sanctuary Bible. Yet, I have kept coming back to the KJV for my main study bible. There is a reason for this. 

The language is the most beautiful and majestic form of the Textus Receptus or Traditional Text. As well, it is the translation that our Reformed Faith has used historically and confessed was an accurate English Translation of the Received Text Base. As a Confessional Bibliology proponent I hold that God's Words are persevered and kept pure in all ages. This means that I hold that our Bible that Protestants have used  for ages was an accurate English translation. Not that the translation itself was inspired, but, that the text base we always had in the languages translated to the English in the KJV was preserved as His accurate words. 

The AV/KJV was and still is an accurate English Translation of the Original Greek and Hebrew as found in the Traditional/Confessional Text. Unlike Modern Textual Criticism; Reformation Textual Criticism does not doubt that God Preserved His Words in the historical confessional Greek and Hebrew Text it was not corrupted. The Received Text used as the base for translations before the entrance of Modern textual criticism was Preserved by God to make sure His Word down to the very jots and titles was preserved for All Ages and Kept Pure. There is no reason to hate on the KJV as not being an accurate translation of God's preserved Received Text. 

Quite the opposite of what hyper anti KJV influencers in Christian thought teach. The Received Text matches what we find in the Majority of all finds of manuscripts and papyri. Meaning God really did preserve His Word down to the jot and title in the Confessional Text Base. In fact, TR and Majority Text Bibles are the most accurate translations. Due to the text base used and its accurate translation means that the Authorized Version/King James Version is also one of the most accurate English Bibles available still. I would say anything in the TR Tradition; found in the KJV Family and MEV are the most accurate English Bibles. In addition; The Gideon's have a wonderful TR ESV that accurately translates confessional renderings missing from the other rendition of the English Standard Translation. 

Modern English Versions and Gideon's English Standard Translations are harder to find. So, if you wish to use modern English renderings of the Received/Confessional text and cannot find them I would recommend to stick with the New King James Version. I am not as some extremists do saying ESV or NASB or even NIV is Satan's Bibles. ESV is the one that my church uses as a pew bible. I do not accuse them of not preaching God's Word because of using a Modern Critical Text version. Despite my issues with the translation methodology.

Refuting Brandan Robertson

Gay Interpretations of Scripture & UFO's

Tuesday, March 14, 2023

Eschatology and Law, Pilgrim Theology, and "Conquer the Land of Cannan" motif w/Tim Bushong

Calvin, Two Kingdom Theology, and Theonomy "By What Standard?" with Postmil Tim Bushong

Andy Stanley: Unhitched, Empathetic, and Out Of Control

Cessationist Conference 2022

3 minute message that will save your life by Phil Johnson

Is There a Baby in the Charismatic Bathwater? (Phil Johnson)

Who is a Hyper Calvinist?

Spurgeon and Hyper-Calvinism Special Guest Phil Johnson

Phil Johnson | Closet Calvinists | Is Arminianism a Damnable Heresy?

Download Phil's Sermon

What is Theonomy? By Joe Boot, Nathan Oblak, Ryan Eras / March 17, 2021

When To Stop Calling Someone A Brother In Christ | with James White

Biblical Womanhood w/Lori Alexander

Theological Jenga & Full Preterism | Doug Wilson

Rev. Dr. Joseph Boot:The Heresy of Liberal Democracy

Re. Patrick Hines - Redrawing the Battle Lines - The Bible and Evolution (Chapter 1)

Rev. Paul Flynn | Is Arminianism a Damnable Heresy?

Rev. Paul Flynn "Consistent Arminianism is a False gospel, but, we praise God that many Arminians are not consistent and trust in Christ alone. If they don't trust in Christ alone then they are lost. We need to be careful to not think perfect doctrine saves. Many don't reject true Calvinism but a caricature. True and Consistent Arminianisn is in fact not Biblical and rejects the truth found in Scripture"

Dr. James White | Is Arminianism a Damnable Heresy?

Dr. James White: “…consistent, full-on Arminianism I do believe leads, inevitably and consistently (please note those terms), to a non-saving, man-centered system of religion. No question about it. But there is all the difference in the world to confess that and, at the same time, to recognize what I have often called the “blessed inconsistencies” of our Arminian, or more accurately, synergistic, brothers and sisters in Christ. I have met very few consistent Arminians—I have met many who have firmly extolled truths that have no place in a consistent Arminianism, and yet they are unaware of how their system is self-contradictory. I was one of those—every Calvinist that came to the Reformed position through prayer and study of the Word knows what I mean. But I was not saved the day I asked John Calvin into my heart. I was saved when I trusted in Jesus, and He faithfully led me, by His grace, to an understanding of His truth. In His time. In His fashion.”

(some) “tell God He has no right to draw a straight line with a crooked stick. It is straightforward: until you embrace all of Calvinism (I wonder just how much of that they really believe, or just how perfect their own understanding actually is?), you are lost. Unsaved. Enemy of God. Only Calvinists are saved. Pretty blunt, but there it is. Hyper-Calvinism in all its theological snobbery and perfectionism, never realizing that God works with sinners over time, in His own way, to cause them to GROW in grace and the knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ. I was an heir of grace before I ever heard of John Calvin, ever heard of particular redemption, ever heard of many elements of Reformed theology. Once you start making the definition of the gospel more strict than the Spirit did in the Word, you have walked out of grace and into the realm of error yourself. Mark these men, keep an eye out for them! Few things can kill a Reformed church faster than graceless hyperism.”

300 Page Response to MERE MOLINISM

RC Sproul | Are Arminians Christian? Yes, despite their Theological Heresy. As Christ Saves not Reformed Theology.


Yes, barely, by a blessed inconsistency. As Christ Saves not The Doctrines of Grace we can both be In The Kingdom. As long as they do not take their Arminianism to its logical conclusions. In which case they are absolutely a heretic and should be witnessed to. 

Reforming Free Will

Free-Will Debate: Hernandez & Zachariades vs. Flowers & Pritchett

  


Provisionism preached by Leighton and Pritchett is a form of Graceless False Gospel. It is the resurfacing of the False Pelagian Religion a lie right from the pit of hell.

(Consistent) Arminianism: A Cheap-Grace, Gospel-less Heresy (Br. Sonny Hernandez)

https://web.archive.org/web/20210301195118/https://www.reformingamericaministries.com/single-post/2017/11/20/Arminianism-A-Cheap-Grace-Gospel-less-Heresy

"If we sum up the evidence that has been given, we shall find its amount to be, that (Consistent/Remonstrant) Arminianism came from the Church of Rome, and leads back again to the pit whence it was digged." - Augustus Toplady

(Consistent/Remonstrant) Arminianism is a foul heresy! No prophet of God, nor Paul, nor Christ, ever proclaimed this semi-Pelagian, cheap grace gospel that is powerless to save because it is no gospel at all. The Canons of Dort refer to Arminianism as a “novel idea,” an “invention of the human mind,” “or gross error,” that “…contradicts the Holy Scripture.” This theological essay will explain a few reasons why Arminianism is a foul heresy and not an inconsequential doctrine that Christians can ignore.


I. WHY IS CONSISTENT ARMINIANISM (As Historically Originating in the Remonstrant at Dort) HERESY?

Arminianism teaches that human beings are not totally depraved because they can exercise their frail and fickle free will to save themselves. This is contrary to Holy Scripture––which teaches that sinners are conceived in sin, dead in sin, slaves to sin, and are servants of sin––that are totally polluted in all faculties and parts of the body and soul. To argue that a sinner can come to Christ by exercising their free will is to falsely assume that they have the “desire” to do this, which is clearly antithetical to the teachings of Paul (Rom. 3:10-18).

Free will is the great idol of fallen men who elevate their gross decisions above God’s decree. This is commonly known as contra-causal freedom, or libertarianism––which is a subterfuge that cannot save, nor has it ever saved anyone––because presumed free-will can only send people to hell, and none to heaven. There are several problems that arise from this sophistry:

If God justified a man because he made himself differ from other men with his libertarian freedom to accept Christ, this would make God a respecter of persons, which clearly contradicts Scripture (Acts 10:34). Only a boastful man would dare argue that he is the co-savior or captain of his soul because his decision to be saved was more profitable than someone else’s when both had the same grace extended to them. 
No one can rescue themselves from God’s wrath, or come to Christ on their own terms or timing, because God has decreed before the foundation of the world that all things––including the salvation of individuals––whatsoever shall come to pass.

Arminianism elevates human decisions above God’s decree. It subjects God’s decree to man’s decision in lieu of subjugating man’s decision under God’s decree. Thereby, Arminians will argue that God’s election and reprobation are contingent upon foreseen faith or disbelief, that is, whether a depraved sinner is going to either accept or deny Him. This is not language from heaven; this is a lie from hell! What are the problems with this argument?

If God has to foresee whether a sinner will either accept or deny Him––this would mean that God would have to see something in the sinner that He must laud, and not loathe. God sees absolutely nothing in anyone that He must praise, since our best works do not merit His favor, but His wrath. Also, if God must foresee whether the sinner will either accept or deny him, then God is not transcendent. The all-knowing God does not need to foresee; He already knows from all eternity, and that is so because He has ordained everything that comes to pass.

Arminianism is diabolical because it teaches that the vicarious and atoning death of Christ was made universally for all, even to include those whom the Father has consigned to everlasting torment in hell. Does this mean that Christ actually redeemed or just made sinners redeemable? If Christ died for all––this would mean that Christ only made sinners redeemable. Therefore, because the application of His death is contingent upon the mere will of men to either accept or deny Him, this cannot be the glorious gospel of grace.

Arminianism distorts the teachings of God’s free grace. If God’s grace is contingent upon man’s decision, then God's grace is not free, and salvation would have to be ascribed to man and not God. Also, if the will of man precedes the will of God, or if the power of God in the gospel is only possible if men cooperate, then Paul would be a liar because he said that “it is God that works in us to will and to do” (Phil. 2:13), and he called the gospel the power of God unto salvation (Rom. 1:16). This is why advocates of semi-Pelagian popery are teachers of their own righteousness, and despisers of free grace.

Arminianism will contradictorily teach that regenerate saints can fall from the faith that they once previously accepted. Unlettered men or women will denounce this necessary conclusion, and will posit that not all Arminians will agree with this notion. Despite these conjectures or opinions of men or women, Arminians can never have assurance of their salvation because if they have the free will to be saved, then to be logically consistent, they will have the ability to lose it also. On the contrary, regenerate Christians can have assurance of their salvation, since God’s decree is unchangeable, eternal, and absolute.

"Provisionism," A Dangerous and Fatal False Gospel! Beware Leighton Flowers is a dangerous Heretical False Teacher!

In this article I wish to explain why Leighton Flowers views are outside of The True Gospel. His views which combined are known as Provisionism are completely outside of Historical Christianity. It is, as to borrow from Sonny Hernandez, A Cheap-Grace, Gospel-less Heresy.

To further borrow from Brother Hernandez. Provisionism is a foul heresy! No prophet of God, nor Paul, nor Christ, ever proclaimed this semi-Pelagian, cheap grace gospel that is powerless to save because it is no gospel at all. It completely denies Original Sin and any need for even an originating Grace of God to be saved. It denies God's Sovereignty and Providence. 

How do you get saved in this false Gospel?

Easy you simply naturally work up your own faith and simply decide to choose God's Provision of Unlimited and Universally provided Salvation for every person ever born. You have totally unbounded Libertarian free will without any internal inclination towards anything good or evil. You are, in fact all people are naturally not depraved totally or even partially. 

You can always have counter casual options and Predestination does not exist at all. Not even the Ramonstrants Arminianism view of looking through the corridors of time or foreseen Faith. Predestination does not mean that God has a Decree. It is simply the word for being predestined to eternal life through libertarianally choosing to do what is right and obeying God's command to repent/believe. Emphasis on the libertatianally free as in without any determination of God at all.

What does God Know? 

Not much really with no real cohesive view of God's attribute in regards to knowledge of the future. 

Do you need to repent and believe?

No, you will be judged upon the light that you have. Other words Provisionism does not preach The Christian Message that you need to be In Christ to have eternal life. You can have knowledge of God's general creation and believe in Jesus without knowing you do. 

Can you Obey the Commands and Laws of God perfectly?

Sure you can all you need to do is to continually make the right free will decision. 

Does God harden hearts? 

Nope, people grow callus and harden their own hearts. God never intends evil either even for a greater good or his Glory.

What if he is wrong and Calvinism or pre-regeneration depravity or inability is right?

Then God is a horrendous Monster unworthy of Worshipping!

He made a God in his own image and left the True Christian Faith for a free will idol of his own making. Upon doing so he wants to drag as many people away into his False Gospel as he can. Leighton Flowers is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Is he hellbound and outside of the Kingdom? Unless he gets truly Saved and comes back to the Faith he will be going to eternal destruction for his False Religion. He should not be considered among the Church. 

Btw, Molinism & Open Theism are False

Content Review of TIM STRATTON | Does determinism lead to abusive love?

Why I fully embrace being A Reformed Christian Fundamentalist

 Does that sound like an oxymoron to you? That should not be so. I am Reformed and 110 Grade Calvinist. I am so because Calvinism/Reformed Theology is The Gospel as presented in The Bible. The Canons of Dordrecht and its proceeding articles on Unconditional Election, Total Depravity, Limited or Definite Atonement, Irresistible Grace or Effectual Calling and Preservation of the Saints are all taught straight from the Bible.

This does not mean one cannot be a Saved Arminian. We do not get saved by being Reformed we get saved through God's unconditional election to salvation. The Non-Calvinist can be saved just as much as the Calvinist despite Calvinism being the natural outworking of The Biblical Truths. Consistent Remonstrant Arminianism is, however, outright Heresy. All those denying The Doctrines of Grace whom are saved are so despite holding Unbiblical views. By means of the very Doctrines of Grace they deny or even fight against. Arminian Brothers and Sisters are true Christian Brothers/Sisters if they are truly Born Again. However, God would not have been[or be] unjust to save only Calvinists/Reformed Christians.


                 



I am also a Christian Fundamentalist [Historical] as I am totally opposed to Modernism and False Gospels of liberal theology. I refuse to compromise on the fundamentals of true Christianity. Fundamentalism as I am using the term is a 20th-century anti-modernist/liberal orthodox Christian movement. This definition is drawn from the history of the movement, from its inception in the early part of the 20th-century until the present. Though many fundamentalists also hold other beliefs such as King James Only or believer’s baptism, I do not include those beliefs here, for that would exclude men such as John R. Rice (not KJV Only) and J. Gresham Machen (Presbyterian), both recognized leaders of fundamentalism.

To understand fundamentalism one must first understand its opponent: theological liberalism or modernism. The core of liberalism is its reliance on experience over doctrine. Thus the liberal will maintain that the Bible is not necessarily true doctrine but merely information about people’s experience with God. A liberal will appeal to the individual experience of a Christian as the basis of authority. The power of liberalism comes from its use of Christian language with a new definition. Since they reject the objective truth and rely on experience, then words such as ‘salvation,’ ‘Christ,’ and ‘resurrection’ are not taken from the Bible but redefined in a subjective or modern sense. This new definition is formed using modern principles of criticism, science, and philosophy. Thus liberalism is an experience-based theology, that rejects the inerrancy of Scripture in favor of subject personal relationships and modern scientific methods. Though some would define it differently, to do so would reject the writings and arguments of the vast majority of fundamentalists over the past century.

To understand fundamentalism is to place it in its proper context, namely 20th-century America. Fundamentalism’s anti-modernist nature necessitates that there exist modernism for it to oppose. Thus before the late 1800s and early 1900s fundamentalism could not exist because liberalism did not exist, at least not as a movement or theology. To attempt to find fundamentalism in the centuries prior is impossible, though you may find individual aspects of it, such as doctrinal purity or separatism. Only when Christianity was mixed with modern methods of science, history, and theology would there be a need for a group to oppose it. This is the movement we call fundamentalism.

The most basic aspect of fundamentalism is its adherence to the inerrancy of Scripture. This can be defined as a belief in the inspiration of the Scriptures by God that completely rules out any possible error in the transmission, so that what the writers penned on paper was completely true: doctrinally, historically, and scientifically. This view is not a strictly fundamentalist view, as other conservative denomination and groups have also ascribed to it, but it is an essential part of its doctrine. Along with the inspiration of Scripture, fundamentalist hold to four other doctrines, collectively entitled “The Five Fundamentals of the Faith:”
1) Inerrancy of Scriptures
2) Virgin Birth
3) Christ’s Substitutionary Atonement
4) Christ’s Bodily Resurrection
5) The Second Coming of Christ
While many individual would hold more than these, no fundamentalist could hold less. For instance, dispensationalism would later become a hallmark of fundamentalism, but was rejected by J. Gresham Machen, leader of Presbyterian Fundamentalism, and Williams Jennings Bryan, who fought evolution in the Scopes Monkey Trial.
The guiding principle in fundamentalist thought is that the inerrant Bible is foundational to knowledge, and that modernism, with its accompanying ideas of subjectivism, Darwinism and higher criticism, is to be rejected.

The final mark of fundamentalism is its willingness to separate from liberalism. This was evidenced in various leaders of the movement: Machen left Princeton and founded Westminster Theological Seminary, J. Frank Norris left (or was kicked out) of the Southern Baptist Convention, John R. Rice separated from the Southern Baptist Convention and then later from Billy Graham when he associated with liberals. While these men did not categorize these groups as liberal, they believed that they were tolerant of such, and thus separated to defend doctrinal purity.

As J. Gresham Machen put it so well, "if the disjunction is between "Fundamentalism" and "Modernism," then I am willing to call myself a [Christian] Fundamentalist of the most pronounced type." 

Interview and Q&A on Libertarian Free Will, Compatibilism, and the Nature of our Choices

Determinism & Free Will w/ Colton Carlson

Irresistible Truth & The Particular Baptist discuss Libertarian Free Will VS Compatibilism

Monday, March 13, 2023

Why You NEED To TERRIFY Your Kids

Dispensationalism | One Of The Deadliest Doctrines Today

The True History Of Thanksgiving & The Gay GOP Senators Who Dishonored It

Gay Marriage Debate | Doug Wilson & Andrew Sullivan

Catholics & Salvation | Doug Wilson and James White

The Federal Vision | James White and Doug Wilson


 

Stupidity Never Works / The Sweater Vest Dialogues

Does God's Law Apply to Us? | Doug Wilson and James White

The End Times and The Jab | Doug Wilson and James White

Are Christian Nationalists About To Have Egg On Our Face? | with Doug Wilson

Christian Nationalism & The Chaos Of Female Leadership | with Stephen Wolfe

2 Important Debates | Jared Moore Vs. Doug Wilson, William Wolfe Vs. James Lindsey

Figuring Out This Whole “Postmillennial-Theonomy-Covenant Thing” | Jared Longshore

Highlight: Phil Johnson & Theonomy

The New Fault Lines | Which Side Are They On? | Megan Basham

The Most Dangerous False Teachers Exposed! | with Justin Peters

NBC, Doug Wilson, & Christian Nationalism

Should Christians Aim to Take Over the World? - Jeff Durbin

Sunday, March 12, 2023

Reasons Why Postmillennialism Absolutely Matters - Dale Partridge & Joel Joel Webbon

The Postmil/Theonomy Connection

URC of PEI | March 12th, 2023 | Afternoon Service

#AsburyRevival & #JesusIsComingSoon

Tim Keller Just Upset His Donor Base! | Live with Pastor Joel Webbon

The Gospel Coalition & Public School | “Love Your Neighbor, Hate Your Kids”

5 Doctrines That Stunt Sanctification | With Kings Hall

Postmillennialism As Fuel For Evangelism | with Dale Partridge

March 12, 2023 AM Worship

March 12th, 2023, Live Stream (2nd Service): Teaching Service

Which TR does the TRADITIONAL Text use? | Can CT advocates and TR Advocates work together?

Textual Presuppositions | Debating JAMES WHITE | 1 John 5:6-7 & ERASMUS

This is NOT KJV ONLYISM! Talking with Dr. JEFF RIDDLE about the confessional text position.

URC of PEI | March 12th, 2023 | Morning Service

Geelong Reformed Presbyterian Church - March 11th 2023 AM

General Equity Theonomy | Douglas Wilson (Reformed Basics)

Talking Byzantine/TR with pastor DOUG WILSON!

Ask Doug: byzantine over alexandrian text?

Why the King James? | Doug Wilson

Ask Doug: What do you make of errors in KJV?

Saturday, March 11, 2023

Debate With LGBT Theologian Brandan Robertson

Pro-Choice Activists Do NOT Want You to Know This | Jeff Durbin

Is God's Law Unjust, Unfair, and Past?

The Holy Trinity clearly explained by Pastor Chris Rosebrough

Reiki Deception, former Reiki Master warns

Does Christian liberty give freedom to engage in new age practices?

Did the Witch of Endor see Samuel or a Demon?

Bible Book 21. Ecclesiastes Complete King James 1611 Authorized Read Alo...

Bible Book 22. Song of Solomon Complete King James Authorized Read Along...

The Lie of Attraction - Manifesting, The Secret, LOA & New Age Deception

Why I use the Authorized Version/King James Bible

I decided to make a post explaining why I use the Authorized Version/King James Bible as my main Bible translation. Lest you think I hate other versions I do not. I used the NKJV for quite some time as my sanctuary Bible. I also have used the MEV and ESV for my sanctuary Bible. Yet, I have kept coming back to the KJV for my main study bible. There is a reason for this. 

The language is the most beautiful and majestic form of the Textus Receptus or Traditional Text. As well, it is the translation that our Reformed Faith has used historically and confessed was an accurate English Translation of the Received Text Base. As a Confessional Bibliology proponent I hold that God's Words are persevered and kept pure in all ages. This means that I hold that our Bible that Protestants have used  for ages was an accurate English translation. Not that the translation itself was inspired, but, that the text base we always had in the languages translated to the English in the KJV was preserved as His accurate words. 

The AV/KJV was and still is an accurate English Translation of the Original Greek and Hebrew as found in the Traditional/Confessional Text. Unlike Modern Textual Criticism; Reformation Textual Criticism does not doubt that God Preserved His Words in the historical confessional Greek and Hebrew Text it was not corrupted. The Received Text used as the base for translations before the entrance of Modern textual criticism was Preserved by God to make sure His Word down to the very jots and titles was preserved for All Ages and Kept Pure. There is no reason to hate on the KJV as not being an accurate translation of God's preserved Received Text. 

Quite the opposite of what hyper anti KJV influencers in Christian thought teach. The Received Text matches what we find in the Majority of all finds of manuscripts and papyri. Meaning God really did preserve His Word down to the jot and title in the Confessional Text Base. In fact, TR and Majority Text Bibles are the most accurate translations. Due to the text base used and its accurate translation means that the Authorized Version/King James Version is also one of the most accurate English Bibles available still. I would say anything in the TR Tradition; found in the KJV Family and MEV are the most accurate English Bibles. In addition; The Gideon's have a wonderful TR ESV that accurately translates confessional renderings missing from the other rendition of the English Standard Translation. 

Modern English Versions and Gideon's English Standard Translations are harder to find. So, if you wish to use modern English renderings of the Received/Confessional text and cannot find them I would recommend to stick with the New King James Version. I am not as some extremists do saying ESV or NASB or even NIV is Satan's Bibles. ESV is the one that my church uses as a pew bible. I do not accuse them of not preaching God's Word because of using a Modern Critical Text version. I do have issues with its translation methodology. I would prefer they use the NKJV for modern English renderings.

Jesus Revolution or False Revival?

Friday, March 10, 2023

Take Two on Mark Jones article.

This is a second take on Mark Jones recent article about Pastoring during a Pandemic. Previously I addressed how some have come across to those on the other side in their replies to Mark Jones. I must admit I read through Pastor Jones' article very speedily when I first read it. Having reread it slowly I noticed quips with it myself too be honest. 

My issue is not with trying to present the Romans 13 means Obey the government interpretation. As I have said I know lots of Christian Brothers and Sisters that have and still do believe it teaches just that. Where I had issues was with not addressing the reason the resist Government side had for holding their view. There was no showing the reasons that resisters view the Bible as teaching what happened was an over reach to be resisted. 

As someone whom is on the resist side of this, but, does not talk about it often let me present the other side. Romans 13 not only mentions obeying the government. It also states that The Government is to be rewarding the good and punishing evil. There is only one source to know what is good or evil. That is The Holy Bible. Which means you get what the State is supposed to be doing from The Bible. There is nowhere in The Bibles mandate for a Civil Government where it gets the ability to tell The Church what to do. Such as telling them what to wear or not in Worship (masks). Or whether it can be open or not (lockdowns). 

According to The Belgic Confession (Article 36); The Government has a duty to protect The Churches ability to do Her part in society.

 "Their office is not only to have regard unto and watch for the welfare of the civil state, but also to protect the sacred ministry,* that the kingdom of Christ may thus be promoted. They must therefore countenance the preaching of the Word of the gospel everywhere, that God may be honored and worshipped by every one, as He commands in His Word." 

This would mean that The Civil Magistrate cannot tell The Church how to do Her business in society. Such as mandating them to lockdown or mandating a Churches congregation to wear a mask. Or force its members to take a vaccine to attend the Church building. All of the very things Protestant Resistance Theory promoters were against the Government doing and refused to obey. The resist side is not a new thing in Protestant History that just came about because of Covid. It has long sense existed as an Orthodox view of the Reformed Faith as well as within Presbyterian History. If anything, the Covid stuff simply helped bring to the surface what was already there lingering.  

My two cents on the replies to Mark Jones

Recently there has been a lot of back and forth over Mark Jones article about the various views on the Covid mandates and The Church. In this article I would like to give my two cents on this topic. First of all I want to state that I am anti health mandates and also in favor of Churches staying open VS closing. I, however, started out Covid on the other side of the debate. As this is the case I feel I can give an objective look at both sides of the debate. Many people I know are still on the other side of this debate. 

It is because I know so many good and faithful Christian Brothers and Sisters whom still feel following the Public Health Orders was right that I write this article. I think they would be wrong to close down the Churches if the Government declares another lockdown. I also know that my view is not shared by all those in my Church. I would be totally out of line to question their faithfulness to God or anything else about their Salvation over disagreements related to politics. 

The Truth is faithful God fearing people exist on both sides of the State Authority over The Church issues. There is an interpretation of Romans 13 that certainly leads to the Obey all Government Edicts view. This is a view that even John MacArthur; up until the Covid measures had held. I hold a Romans 13 tells us what the State ought to or ought not to do view. That its soul Biblical Mandate is the rewarding of God and punishing of evil. Which means the Government had no Biblical Mandate to do anything it did during the past couple years. 

However, I know a good number of people disagree with me about this within My own Church and within other Churches. I do not considered them sell outs. Instead I admit, it is a matter of interpretation over certain passages and their meaning. This does not mean I agree with their interpretation of key passages. Yet, this does not mean I let this build up any sort of wall between me and them. 

My main worry is that people are forsaking seeing those that disagree as Brothers in Christ and or not faithful or Godly if they take a position counter to theirs on either side of the issue. Humility is called for from both sides on these issues. That is my two cents on the matter.

Wednesday, March 1, 2023

Abortion and the Freedom of Religion Fallacy | Chris Hume

What is Postmillenialism?

What is Theonomy?

Christophobia: War Against Christianity - Persecution/Martyrdom of Chris...

What Makes Someone A Theonomist?

Highlight: Phil Johnson & Theonomy

Kris on Twitter re: Theonomy

There is an entity behind all world events. God! Our Heavenly Father!

God sovereignly ordains all that has and all that will come to pass. He is in Charge of His Creation. Evil entities that might exist, exist on a leash and cannot get away with anything God has not ordained for His purposes.

All people and institutions are nothing, but, the clay in the hands of the Potter. He gets to ultimately decide what will happen with His Clay. We do not live in a random universe and chance or coincidence does not truly exist. 

God for ordains all that has and will come to pass while at the same time allowing for free agency. Yet, even free agency is not free from God's Decree and Sovereign Rule. He does not coerce or force people to desire certain things nor is He the author of sin or evil. 

Both things come from within the creature (even supernatural evil only works because of the fallen human nature) and are not forced or pushed into the creature by God. However, He did ordain and decree that Evil exist for His own purposes. Yet, He did not take part nor never can due to his nature in Evil or sin. Yet, He can and does use it within His Eternal Decree. 

Some Christians have forgotten that God is Sovereign over all things. That he Decreed all that would and will happen from Eternity Past. They get so wrapped into the evil that is around them and how very evil it is forgetting God Is the One In Charge from Heaven and not any other entities. 

The way this Creation works according to Biblical exegetics is wonderfully worded as follows in The Westminster Confession of Faith;


• God from all eternity did by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so as thereby neither is God the author of sin; nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established.


• God, the great Creator of all things, doth uphold, direct dispose, and govern all creatures, actions, and things, from the greatest even to the least, by His most wise and holy providence, according to His infallible foreknowledge, and the free and immutable counsel of His own will, to the praise of the glory of His wisdom, power, justice, goodness, and mercy. 


• Although in relation to the foreknowledge and decree of God, the first cause, all things come to pass immutably and infallibly, yet, by the same providence, He ordereth them to fall out according to the nature of second causes, either necessarily, freely, or contingently.


• God, in His ordinary providence, maketh use of means, yet is free to work without, above, and against them, at His pleasure. 


• The almighty power, unsearchable wisdom, and infinite goodness of God, so far manifest themselves in His providence, that it extendeth itself even to the first fall, and all other sins of angels and men, and that not by a bare permission, but such as hath joined with it a most wise and powerful bounding, and otherwise ordering and governing of them, in a manifold dispensation, to His own holy ends; yet so, as the sinfulness thereof proceedeth only from the creature, and not from God; who being most holy and righteous, neither is nor can be the author or approver of sin.


This means no matter what or how evil things in our World are or are getting or have been since the Fall of Adam God is still in Control of all things in Heaven and on Earth. Often God will use others evil for his own Godly ends. AKA Joseph and his brothers. 

It is very possible the reason God has used some of things that have been going on lately and in the near future is as a judgment and punishments against the reprobate. As well as discipline for His Children a chiding for some purpose. Or it could be anything really, but, we know it is all in His Hands as the old song says. "He's got the whole world in His Hands."

Megiddo Radio · #353 Leighton Flowers Interviews 'Former Calvinist' Who Hated Calvinism

Megiddo Radio · #356 Leighton Flowers & Andy Stanley Unite to Slander Calvinists

Megiddo Radio · #352 Our Final Authority in a Fluid Canon?