What I mean by KJV Only - believing that God has preserved the Heb OT & Greek Received NT, and that the KJV is the best and most faithful translation of those texts into English.
I stand on the KJV as God's Perfectly Providentially Preserved Word Accurately Translated for the English speaking people. That it has everything needed from the Word of God for His Children.
I do not though judge someone's Christianity or whether they are a blessed Brother or Sister in Christ based on if they use The KJV/AV or not.
I do, however, wish that all Biblical Fundamentalist Bible Believing Churches would look into all the great information out there that defends the TR/KJV position before coming to their preferred Bible translation.
As opposed to jumping onto the modern Critical Text Translations by default and assuming the defense of the KJV/TR is a fringe weird idea based on the weird views of some of the extreme fringes of the more diverse Textus-Receptus/Received Text/King James Defenders.
I find after much prayer and research that the KJV is God's Perfectly Providentially Preserved Word Accurately Translated for the English speaking people. That it has everything needed from the Word of God for His Children. That no others have been made which surpass it nor do updates add things. If anything modern translations are missing passages due to Modernism and The Modern Critical Theory of textual translation.
I do not agree with people whom would or do push for me to biblical separation from others over the King James issue or position. Nor, do I think it is appropriate to judge fellow Christians faith/Born Again status based on their lack of KJV use. Thus I am solidly KJV Only, but, I am not that type of King James Only. Nor do I agree with the nuttier defenders of the KJVO position. For their number is many and their views are not charitable at all.
