Born Again Christian; Biblical Fundamentalist, Received Text-KJV, Dispensational

Born Again Christian; Biblical Fundamentalist, Received Text-KJV, Dispensational

Wednesday, November 15, 2023

Dante Bowe, Chris Tomlin, and Lecrae... Sacred or Secular?

Taylor Swift, P!nk, Demi Lovato And The Divine Feminine

The Demonic Spirit Behind Woke Smoke

Bill Johnson Setting The Stage For The End Times Delusion

Numbers Chapter 19 - The Holy Bible KJV Read Along

Lauren Boebert's Public Indecency, Andy Stanley's Apostasy

Amusement Park Amuses Satan, Britney Spears Demonic Downfall

Cultural Toxicity Against Biblical Masculinity

Robert Johnson: The Attraction Of Selling Your Soul

Matthew Perry's Cry For Help; Bishop Barron's False Gospel To Ben Shapiro

Kat Von D, The Occult And Christianity

The Sad Reality Of Conservatism Without Jesus

Taylor Swift: From High School Sweetheart to Provocative Witch

Thursday, November 9, 2023

What genuinely is a Christian fundamentalist? You should be one.

I am a Christian Fundamentalist as I am totally opposed to Modernism and False Gospels of liberal theology. I refuse to compromise on the fundamentals of true Christianity. Fundamentalism as I am using the term is a 20th-century anti-modern/liberal orthodox Christian movement. This definition is drawn from the history of the movement, from its inception in the early part of the 20th-century until the present.

To understand fundamentalism one must first understand its opponent: theological liberalism or modernism. The core of liberalism is its reliance on experience over doctrine. Thus the liberal will maintain that the Bible is not necessarily true doctrine but merely information about people’s experience with God. A liberal will appeal to the individual experience of a Christian as the basis of authority. The power of liberalism comes from its use of Christian language with a new definition. Since they reject the objective truth and rely on experience, then words such as ‘salvation,’ ‘Christ,’ and ‘resurrection’ are not taken from the Bible but redefined in a subjective or modern sense. This new definition is formed using modern principles of criticism, science, and philosophy. Thus liberalism is an experience-based theology, that rejects the inerrancy of Scripture in favor of subject personal relationships and modern scientific methods. Though some would define it differently, to do so would reject the writings and arguments of the vast majority of fundamentalists over the past century.

To understand fundamentalism is to place it in its proper context, namely 20th-century America. Fundamentalism’s anti-modernist nature necessitates that there exist modernism for it to oppose. Thus before the late 1800s and early 1900s fundamentalism could not exist because liberalism did not exist, at least not as a movement or theology. To attempt to find fundamentalism in the centuries prior is impossible, though you may find individual aspects of it, such as doctrinal purity or separatism. Only when Christianity was mixed with modern methods of science, history, and theology would there be a need for a group to oppose it. This is the movement we call fundamentalism.

The most basic aspect of fundamentalism is its adherence to the inerrancy of Scripture. This can be defined as a belief in the inspiration of the Scriptures by God that completely rules out any possible error in the transmission, so that what the writers penned on paper was completely true: doctrinally, historically, and scientifically. This view is not a strictly fundamentalist view, as other conservative denomination and groups have also ascribed to it, but it is an essential part of its doctrine. Along with the inspiration of Scripture, fundamentalist hold to four other doctrines, collectively entitled “The Five Fundamentals of the Faith:”
1) Inerrancy of Scriptures
2) Virgin Birth
3) Christ’s Substitutionary Atonement
4) Christ’s Bodily Resurrection
5) The Second Coming of Christ
While many individual would hold more than these, no fundamentalist could hold less. For instance, a dispensationalist view would later become a hallmark of fundamentalism, but was rejected by J. Gresham Machen, leader of Presbyterian Fundamentalism, and Williams Jennings Bryan, who fought evolution in the Scopes Monkey Trial.
The guiding principle in fundamentalist thought is that the inerrant Bible is foundational to knowledge, and that modernism, with its accompanying ideas of subjectivism, Darwinism and higher criticism, is to be rejected.

The final mark of fundamentalism is its willingness to separate from liberalism. This was evidenced in various leaders of the movement: Machen left Princeton and founded Westminster Theological Seminary, J. Frank Norris left (or was kicked out) of the Southern Baptist Convention, John R. Rice separated from the Southern Baptist Convention and then later from Billy Graham when he associated with liberals. While these men did not categorize these groups as liberal, they believed that they were tolerant of such, and thus separated to defend doctrinal purity.

If the disjunction is between "Christian Fundamentalism" and "Modernism," then I am a Christian Fundamentalist of the most pronounced type.

“Fundamentalism (in so far as consistent Biblical Theology is meant by this term) is in principle nothing but Christianity itself.”

“‘Fundamentalism’ is the only consistently thought-out version of the faith, and the ‘Fundamentalist’ is the only Christian who uses his mind in a fully Christian way.” —J. I. Packer

“The deepest cleavages in Christendom are doctrinal; and the deepest doctrinal cleavages are those which result from disagreement about authority.”

“Sham unity is not worth working for, and real unity, that fellowship of love in the truth which Christ prayed that His disciples might enjoy, will come only as those sections of the wall which rest on unsound foundations are dismantled and rebuilt.” —J. I. Packer

People use the term “fundamentalist” in a disparaging sense because of a handful of bad apples who abuse the title At its core, fundamentalism is about nothing more than getting back to fundamental tenets and beliefs of Christianity, following what the Bible says and guided (but not reliant upon) the historical understanding of scripture by the early Church and Church Fathers.

What is The Gospel?

God Created all things and said it was good. He placed the first man and woman in The Garden of Eden. They were named Adam and Eve. Through the persuasion of an evil entity in the form of a serpent Adam and Eve died spirituality due to eating from a forbidden tree.

This caused the curse of the entire creation and all humans being born in radical depravity and separated from God (spiritually dead). A slave to sin and bound to physical death leading to eternal judgment in a place called hell. The justice we all deserve for our sin nature. 

However, God so loved the world that He gave His only Begotten Son through crucifixion on a cross as an Atonement for the whole world He so loved. So, that whomsoever in the Whole World believes on Him (Jesus Christ) with a Godly repentance will not perish, but, will have eternal life. 

Ones salvation is based on a genuine free will decision to accept or reject God's Grace and to thus not take part in God's desire to save you. The Atonement and Christ's Blood is for all! God's Grace frees you from your Depravity to respond by, repentance, belief and True Faith. This causes you to be placed in Christ's sheep fold and the Blood of Chris to be applied to you.

This leaves those that have not done so with actually only themselves to blame for going to eternal damnation and the fires of eternal hell. So, I plead with you to not ignore the call and drawing of The Father through His Holy Spirit. While Salvation has been provided for you it is up to you to accept God's Free Gift and Provision to you. 

Christ is not a way, but, The Way, Truth and Life. No one gets saved; into the Kingdom of God and then on the New Heavens/New Earth. Until accepting your depravity and responding in repentance and True Faith on Christ and His accomplishments on Your behalf.

It is the most important thing you will ever do! Once you have True Faith God and His Holy Spirit has promised to keep you sealed as His Own Until the End of all things has come. Repent, believe today and come to Christ! While the time is at hand! 

Wednesday, November 8, 2023

The Bible mandates free market capitalism. It is an anti-socialist document.

The essence of democratic socialism is this re-written version of God's commandment: "Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote."

"Economic democracy" is the system whereby two wolves and a sheep vote on what to have for dinner. Christian socialists and defenders of economic planning by state bureaucrats deeply resent this interpretation of their ethical position. They resent it because it's accurate. When Christianity adheres to the judicial specifics of the Bible, it produces free market capitalism.


On the other hand, when Christianity rejects the judicial specifics of the Bible, it produces socialism or some politically run hybrid "middle way" between capitalism and socialism, where politicians and bureaucrats make the big decisions about how people's wealth will be allocated. Economic growth then slows or is reversed. Always.


Free market capitalism produces long-term economic growth. Socialism and middle-way economic interventionism by the state produce poverty and bureaucracy. If your goal is to keep poor people poor, generation after generation, you should promote socialism. But be sure to call it economic democracy in order to fool the voters.


The Bible is an anti-socialist document. Socialist propagandists for over four centuries have claimed that the Bible teaches socialism, but we have yet to see a single Bible commentary written by a socialist. If the Bible teaches socialism, where is the expository evidence?


When I say that the Bible mandates a moral and legal social order that inevitably produces free market capitalism, I have the evidence to back up my position. My critics -- critics of capitalism -- do not.


The next time you hear someone say that the Bible teaches anything but free market capitalism, ask him or her which Bible commentary demonstrates this. You will get a blank stare followed by a lot of verbal tap-dancing about "the ultimate ethic of the Bible" or "the upholding of the poor in the Bible." You will be given a lot of blah, blah, blah. Blah, blah, blah is not a valid substitute for biblical exposition.

Fact: There has never been an expository Bible commentary that shows that the Bible teaches anything other than free market capitalism.

Saturday, October 28, 2023

Halloween Unmasked | 2023

Halloween Unmasked | 2022

Halloween Unmasked | 2021

Halloween Unmasked | 2020

Halloween Unmasked | 2019

Halloween Unmasked | 2018

The Ouija Board: It's NOT a Game! #ouija #demonic #witchcraft #Jesus

"The Doctrine of the Holy Spirit" - Part 2

Kath Von D: Another Celebrity False Convert?

UK University to Offer Degree in "Occult Sciences"!!! #thirdadam

"Process of Mystery Religion" - Third Adam 4

Gothard's Umbrella Chart: A Biblical Truth or Oppressive Lie?

Sunday, October 15, 2023

Exposing Catholicism, Which Queen of Heaven pt 1 by Doc Marquis

URC of PEI | October 15th, 2023 | Evening Service

URC of PEI | October 15th, 2023 | Morning Service

William (Bill) Cooper - One World Order (rare find)

Doc Marquis - America's Occult Holydays

The Money Masters (1996) Full Documentary

House of Windsor and the New World Order

Genesis of Dispensational Theology

Where Did Secret Rapture Theology Come From? Ben Witherington III

Sam Adams - Chuck Baldwin's Jesuit Preterism Debunked

The Jesuits’ Catholic Counter Reformation — Preterism & Dispensationalist Theology

Dean Odle EU - Prophecy Quake - The Jesuit Deception of Preterism

Jesuit Origins of the Pre-Tribulation Rapture

Thursday, October 12, 2023

Voddie Baucham on Sovereignty

Voluntaryism and Its Christian Roots

Determined to Deny Determinism? | Dr. Leighton Flowers | Soteriology 101

Bible Book #17 - The Holy Bible KJV HD 4K Audio-Text

Rejecting "Calvinism" and Embracing simply being a Christian fundamentalist

Lately I have been researching and rereading the Bible without any systematic of mankind's put on top of it. This has lead me to reject Calvinist soteriology. It is very clear by many passages which use the Greek term Kosmos meaning all entire world that the idea of limiting the Atonement and provision of the Blood of Jesus is not possible.

Of course, that is not the only thing that makes me need to reject the Calvinist TULIP. It was the inconsistency of what The Gospel message affirms and affirming the rest of the system. We cannot truly believe that God wishes for all to Repent and Believe if the offer is not genuine. Which if only the elect are saved they cannot do what they are called to do by God Himself under the unconditional election and limited Atonement doctrines. 

Ones salvation is based on a genuine free will decision to accept or reject God's Prevenient Grace and to thus not take part in God's desire to save you. The Atonement is not limited and Christ's Blood is for all! However, the Grace which frees you from your Depravity to respond by, repentance, belief and True Faith is resistible not Irresistible as Calvinism maintains. Nor doss regeneration proceed Faith placing being Born Again before having Faith. Your repentance, belief and True Faith is what causes you to be placed in Christ's sheep fold and the Blood of Chris to be accepted by you. 

This leaves those that have not done so with actually only themselves to blame for going to eternal damnation and the fires of eternal hell. So, I plead with you to not ignore the call and drawing of The Father through His Holy Spirit. While Salvation has been provided for you it is up to you to accept God's Free Gift and Provision to you. Christ is not a way, but, The Way, Truth and Life. No one gets saved; into the Kingdom of God and then on the New Heavens/New Earth. Until accepting your depravity and responding in repentance and True Faith on Christ and His accomplishments on Your behalf.

It is the most important thing you will ever do. Once you have True Faith God and His Holy Spirit has promised to keep you sealed as His Own Until the End of all things has come. 

I am a Christian Fundamentalist as I am totally opposed to Modernism and False Gospels of liberal theology. I refuse to compromise on the fundamentals of true Christianity. Fundamentalism as I am using the term is a 20th-century anti-modern/liberal orthodox Christian movement. This definition is drawn from the history of the movement, from its inception in the early part of the 20th-century until the present.

To understand fundamentalism one must first understand its opponent: theological liberalism or modernism. The core of liberalism is its reliance on experience over doctrine. Thus the liberal will maintain that the Bible is not necessarily true doctrine but merely information about people’s experience with God. A liberal will appeal to the individual experience of a Christian as the basis of authority. The power of liberalism comes from its use of Christian language with a new definition. Since they reject the objective truth and rely on experience, then words such as ‘salvation,’ ‘Christ,’ and ‘resurrection’ are not taken from the Bible but redefined in a subjective or modern sense. This new definition is formed using modern principles of criticism, science, and philosophy. Thus liberalism is an experience-based theology, that rejects the inerrancy of Scripture in favor of subject personal relationships and modern scientific methods. Though some would define it differently, to do so would reject the writings and arguments of the vast majority of fundamentalists over the past century.

To understand fundamentalism is to place it in its proper context, namely 20th-century America. Fundamentalism’s anti-modernist nature necessitates that there exist modernism for it to oppose. Thus before the late 1800s and early 1900s fundamentalism could not exist because liberalism did not exist, at least not as a movement or theology. To attempt to find fundamentalism in the centuries prior is impossible, though you may find individual aspects of it, such as doctrinal purity or separatism. Only when Christianity was mixed with modern methods of science, history, and theology would there be a need for a group to oppose it. This is the movement we call fundamentalism.

The most basic aspect of fundamentalism is its adherence to the inerrancy of Scripture. This can be defined as a belief in the inspiration of the Scriptures by God that completely rules out any possible error in the transmission, so that what the writers penned on paper was completely true: doctrinally, historically, and scientifically. This view is not a strictly fundamentalist view, as other conservative denomination and groups have also ascribed to it, but it is an essential part of its doctrine. Along with the inspiration of Scripture, fundamentalist hold to four other doctrines, collectively entitled “The Five Fundamentals of the Faith:”
1) Inerrancy of Scriptures
2) Virgin Birth
3) Christ’s Substitutionary Atonement
4) Christ’s Bodily Resurrection
5) The Second Coming of Christ
While many individual would hold more than these, no fundamentalist could hold less. For instance, a dispensationalist view would later become a hallmark of fundamentalism, but was rejected by J. Gresham Machen, leader of Presbyterian Fundamentalism, and Williams Jennings Bryan, who fought evolution in the Scopes Monkey Trial.
The guiding principle in fundamentalist thought is that the inerrant Bible is foundational to knowledge, and that modernism, with its accompanying ideas of subjectivism, Darwinism and higher criticism, is to be rejected.

The final mark of fundamentalism is its willingness to separate from liberalism. This was evidenced in various leaders of the movement: Machen left Princeton and founded Westminster Theological Seminary, J. Frank Norris left (or was kicked out) of the Southern Baptist Convention, John R. Rice separated from the Southern Baptist Convention and then later from Billy Graham when he associated with liberals. While these men did not categorize these groups as liberal, they believed that they were tolerant of such, and thus separated to defend doctrinal purity.

If the disjunction is between "Christian Fundamentalism" and "Modernism," then I am a Christian Fundamentalist of the most pronounced type.

“Fundamentalism (in so far as consistent Biblical Theology is meant by this term) is in principle nothing but Christianity itself.”

“‘Fundamentalism’ is the only consistently thought-out version of the faith, and the ‘Fundamentalist’ is the only Christian who uses his mind in a fully Christian way.” —J. I. Packer

“The deepest cleavages in Christendom are doctrinal; and the deepest doctrinal cleavages are those which result from disagreement about authority.”

“Sham unity is not worth working for, and real unity, that fellowship of love in the truth which Christ prayed that His disciples might enjoy, will come only as those sections of the wall which rest on unsound foundations are dismantled and rebuilt.” —J. I. Packer

People use the term “fundamentalist” in a disparaging sense because of a handful of bad apples who abuse the title At its core, fundamentalism is about nothing more than getting back to fundamental tenets and beliefs of Christianity, following what the Bible says and guided (but not reliant upon) the historical understanding of scripture by the early Church and Church Fathers.

How Romans 9-11 Make Me Arminian // Calvinism vs. Arminianism

Provisionism VS Arminianism

Provisionism Rightly Represented

Saturday, October 7, 2023

Adam to Now: Human Genetics and the Biblical Timeline | Eric Hovind

Basics of the Faith: What is Holy Communion

Halloween: Should you celebrate it?

Trinity vs. Modalism Debate: James White vs. Roger Perkins

Jeff Riddle Conference Messages

WM 224: Peter Van Kleeck, Sr. on Providential Preservation

War Against the Authentic Text

WM 213: Peter Van Kleek, Jr.: Philosophical Grounding & A Standard Sacre...

Seven Observations on the James White vs. Peter Van Kleeck, Jr. TR Debate

Reformation Unity: Interviewing a Lutheran Pastor

What's wrong with modern Christian music?

The Providence of God

Does God desire the salvation of everyone? YES

5 solas of the Reformation

Reformation doctrines, what did the Reformers believe?

What Is Sound Doctrine?

The Predestination Debate - White vs Brown

James White vs. Arminian Couple on Unbelievable

Is Molinism Biblical? | Tim Stratton vs. James White

Thursday, October 5, 2023

Discussing Masculine Christianity | With Author & Pastor Zach M. Garris.

Was John Wesley a Postmil or Premil? | Wesley's Millennialism.

Esther Chapter 5 - The Holy Bible KJV Read Along Audio

1,000-Years With Jesus | Premillennialism | With Author, Michael Ervin.

Christians Can't Be Gay! | Answering Why.

End-Times Debate! | Premillennialism vs. Postmillennialism | Lucas U. Cu...

Discussing Christian Nationalism With Stephen Wolfe.

Problems With Amillennialism

The Ante-Nicene Fathers Were Premillennialist | With Author, Michael Bry...

Historic Premillennialism | With Dr. Michael Shultz.

A Case for Historic Premillennialism ( book review)

What is Historic Premillennialism?

disproving pre-tribulation rapture: With Dr. Craig Keener

Historic Premillennialism — Free-for-All Friday

What Is Historic Premillennialism? - Bryan Chapell

Historic Premillennialism by Michael Shultz "Why Eschatology Matters".

"Return to Me" - Zechariah 1:1-6

"Our Only Comfort" - HC Lord's Day 1; Romans 8:31-39

Tuesday, October 3, 2023

Esther Chapter 3 - The Holy Bible KJV Read Along Audio

Origins Of The Nephilim | 3 Primary Views | Tim Chaffey

SHOCKING: Women Are Watching the Barbie Movie and Filing For Divorce!!!

"The Doctrine of the Holy Spirit" - Part 1

SHOCKING: Women Are Watching the Barbie Movie and Filing For Divorce!!!

The "Great Dechurching" Is Upon Us!

John Piper and the Need for Secondary Separation...

Your Sanctification Is Not for You | Theocast

"The Inspiration of the New Testament," Men's Reformed Fellowship

Christian Imposter Syndrome

TS&TT: Should Women Be Theologians? — Complementarianism, Patriarchy, & ...

Biblical and Unbiblical Patriarchy

Overcoming Sin is NOT the Great Commission | ask Theocast

Monday, October 2, 2023

Esther Chapter 2 - The Holy Bible KJV Read Along Audio

TOP Radiometric Dating Proves God's Real! - Dr. Gene Kim

Work Out Your Salvation? | Theocast

Sanctification? God's Work OR Our Work? | Theocast

Questioning Your Salvation? | Theocast

What is a "Prayer Life?" | Theocast

Jesus Plus Nothing | Theocast

From the New Age Frying pan to the Deliverance Fire

The Weakness of Modern Deliverance Ministry

That Pesky Religious Spirit

The Marks of the New Apostolic Reformation with Dawn Hill

Does Scripture Agree with My Personal Experience?

Esther Chapter 1 - The Holy Bible KJV Read Along Audio

Saturday, September 30, 2023

What Is The Gospel? | Theocast

Fully Embracing Being KJV-only. However, rejecting separatism and judgment over The Textual Issue/differences.

First thing I want to distinguish between being KJV Only and being a KJV only-ist. One is you and or your groups or Churches standing on the KJV as God's Perfectly Providentially Preserved Word Accurately Translated for the English speaking people. That it has everything needed from the Word of God for His Children. 

The other can be the idea that the translation itself is somehow secondarily inspired. Not just accurately translated from the Received or Confessional Text. It can also mean that you think non KJV users are heretical and damned. As well as, pushing for separation from Churches that do not use the KJV. 

I am in camp A, but, definitely not B. I find after much prayer and research that the KJV is God's Perfectly Providentially Preserved Word Accurately Translated for the English speaking people. That it has everything needed from the Word of God for His Children. That no others have been made which surpass it nor do updates add things. If anything modern translations are missing passages due to Modernism and The Modern Critical Theory of textual translation. 

I do not agree with people whom would or do push for me to biblical separation from others over the King James issue or position. Nor, do I think it is appropriate to judge fellow Christians faith/Born Again status based on their lack of KJV use. Thus I am solidly KJV Only, but, I am not that type of King James Only. Or a Kings James Only-ist; in that I am not joined in someway to a movement or the more radical members of that group. Nor do I agree with the nuttier defenders of the KJVO position. For their number is many and their views are not charitable at all.

Did We Preexist with Christ?

4 Reasons Why I Believe the KJV is the Best Translation Available

Hocus Pocus: From Witch To Child of God #halloween #witch #exwitch #jesus

Tuesday, September 12, 2023

Malachi Chapter 1 - The Holy Bible KJV Read Along Audio

"Guilt By Association" & The Danger of Sound Doctrine

Dr. Michael Brown Debates Himself

Apostasy Report - The Pure Flix Deception (Ray Comfort & Ken Ham)

Merry Christmas... Now You're A Pagan?

The Pretrib Rapture Deception: A False Hope

Should Christians Choose The Chosen?

Abiding in Christ's Love | HOPC Morning Sermon 9/10/2023

Law of Attraction Deception - Debunking “The Secret” with Jon Clash

“Listen, You Rich Men” (Part 1 of 2) —09/12/2023

Matthew 13:1-3 "The Good Seed"

Psalm 15 "God’s Guests"

Psalm 107 "God’s Fatherly Hand"

Why New Age and Christianity Cannot Blend

Sunday, September 10, 2023

An Overview of Historic Premillennialism

What is Historic Premillennialism?

Zechariah Chapter 14 - The Holy Bible KJV Read Along

How Should A Historic Premillennialist Interpret The Book Of Revelation ...

Historic premillennialism - Tom Shreiner


Historic premillennialism talk by bible commentary writer and Reformed amillennialist Tom Shreiner who changed his mind and converted to Historic premillennialism in 2009.

Historic Premillennial Timeline

Physical Resurrection Proves Historic Premillennialism

Historic Premillennialism Graphic

Classic Premillennialism

Problems With Amillennialism

Reasons to Affirm Historical Premillennialism

The Tribulation and the Rapture - Dr. Walter Martin (Historic Premill)

An Evening of Eschatology – Premillennialism, Amillennialism, Postmillen...

Debate on Amillennialism VS Premillennialism

Eschatology Round Table Discussion

Rehoboth URC Live Stream

Daily Bread

THE FOUNDATION, FRAMEWORK, AND FOCUS OF FAITH

Redeemer URC Sept. 10, 2023 AM Worship Service

Sept 10, 2023 AM Dr. T. Van Raalte Lord's Supper Celebration. Col. 2:13-...

September 10th, 2023 1st Service

Let the Children Come to Me

Christ Among His Brethren

Eastmanville United Reformed Church Live Stream

Eschatology - Amillennialism

Eschatology - Historical Premillennialism & Dispensational Premillennialism

September 10, 2023 l AM | Dr. Gerhard Visscher | Romans 12: 9-16

Prophecy Focus - "The Historical Pre-Millennialism Argument"

Millennial Eschatology Explained (Pre-Mil, A-Mil, Post-Mil)

September 10, 2023, Live Stream (1st Service): Witnesses to the Truth Ab...

Morning Worship

Premillennialism vs. Amillennialism

What is Amillennialism? (Bible Jargon explained)

Premillennialism, Amillennialism, and Postmillennialism - How Important ...

What is the Millennial Reign of Christ in Revelation 20? Amil, Premil or...

End Times Debate: Timothy Woodcock vs Mike Winger

MACP 2012 Roundtable Discussion | "Biblical Evidence for Premillennialism"

Saturday, September 9, 2023

The Eschatology Debate: Premillennialism (Jonathan Weyerhaeuser) Postmillennialism (Jonah Saller)

Catholicism vs. The Bible with Mike Gendron | Redeeming Truth

Different Christian Views of Revelation Explained

“Not Afraid of the Antichrist” with Dr. Michael Brown and Dr. Craig Keener

disproving pre-tribulation rapture: With Dr. Craig Keener

3 minute message that will save your life by Phil Johnson

Basic Training for defending the faith by Dr. Greg Bahnsen

The Gospel Is the Power of God

Interview with Essential Church Director

How were people saved in the Old Testament?

Facing Heart Surgery? To Whom Do You Look?

Adonai-God is Lord: The God We Worship with R.C. Sproul

Defined King James Bible Large Print

Did God Create Evil? Hebrew Scholar Responds

Theistic Evolution DEBUNKED

Nephilim & Sons of God: Who Are They?

Were the sons of God in Genesis 6 fallen angels? Who were the Nephilim?

The New Age Is In Churches #newage #yoga #divination #manifesting #bethel

The Gospel of the Kingdom, Ladd

What Is Historic Premillennialism? - Bryan Chapell

Premillennialism among Presbyterian Fundamentalists

The Marks of the New Apostolic Reformation with Dawn Hill

The Truth About the NAR w/ Holly Pivec and Doug Geivett

Bethel Redding & Modern Apostles: A Biblical Analysis

Should Christians Ever Disobey Their Governments?

Holly Pivec & Doug Geivett | discuss NAR - unbiblical and everywhere

WACKY CONSPIRACY THEORIES | A SIN to Believe In Them??

Introduction to Eschatology

Early Date of Revelation: Before AD 70. Neronian Date

Avoid All Appearance of Evil

Jon Harris: G3 Dust Up, Christian Nationalism, Classic Liberalism, Kinis...