The gender ideology often calls complementarianism (Biblical Man and Womanhood) as being based on old fashioned stereotypes, but, Gender Agenda proponents are really the ones basing their views on social stereotypes of males and females.
Complementarianism is based on the Biblical Mandates on the roles of men and women within the life of the Christian and inside the Church. It is not based on Societies stereotypes. Gender Agenda proponents, however, do base their thinking on societal stereotypes.
Gender Ideology says that literally if your small daughter decides to turn her bow around to be facing a different direction making it less bow like it is a sign they are born in the wrong body. Or that a daughter whom is more into physical things like playing rough and tumble or climbing trees means their brain sex is not their biological sex.
Or that if your son decides to try playing with a doll or something while they are still small and developing they are in the wrong body. Instead of being interested in something different. How more stereotypical could you get?
The same ideas are thrown around surrounding children's orientation. With claim that a child that has certain play patterns means they are born with same sex attractions. Which is the stereotypical position? That play means nothing regards to gender identity nor their future attractions or that a non sexual being a small child is homosexual? Or that play equates to future attractions?
Some men love to cook and some women are not good cooks. This does not mean SSA or GID issues. It means that God made that person without the persuasion to be in a kitchen. Complementarianism is not the social influenced view Gender Ideologies are.
https://uncommongroundmedia.com/gender-is-is-fixed-fluid-or-formed-from-societys-stereotypes/
