Debunking The Holocaust Denial Documentary Judea Declares War on Germany - #2

As I have previously said, the documentary, ‘Judea Declares War on Germany’, is so tightly crammed with bulls**t that it runs the risk of collapsing in on itself like a neutron star. This became a problem when it came to deciding what I wanted to rebuttal next as I felt compelled to refute every inaccuracy and point out every example of data manipulation. However, if I were to do this, I would be publishing videos on the subject for months to come. I have therefore decided to write only one more blog post on the subject and counter what I consider to be the documentary’s strongest argument, that the Nazis did not systematically murder millions of people in their death camps. So, strap yourself in as we talk about the gas chambers….or the lack thereof. Support Myles through Patreon http://patreon.com/powerm1985 Debunking The Holocaust Denial Documentary Judea Declares War on Germany (Part 3) https://mylespower.co.uk/2018/02/17/d... Intro Music by Michael 'Skitch' Schiciano bio: http://bio.skitchmusic.com soundcloud: http://www.soundcloud.com/skitchstudio Subscribe for SCIENCE! Website: http://www.mylespower.co.uk Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/#!/powerm1985 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/powerm1985

Debunking The Holocaust Denial Documentary Judea Declares War on Germany - #1

As unpleasant and potentially dangerous a belief in a conspiracy theory can be they do, for the most part, come from a natural human desire to find an explanation for what appears to be unexplainable. However, there are certain conspiracy theories that come from a much darker place. Where people bend reality to back up and justify their dislike or even hatred towards a certain group of people – and there is no better example of this than those who distort or flat-out deny the facts of the holocaust. Debunking The Holocaust Denial Documentary Judea Declares War on Germany (Part 1) https://mylespower.co.uk/2018/01/23/d... Debunking The Holocaust Denial Documentary Judea Declares War on Germany (Part 2) https://mylespower.co.uk/2018/01/25/d...

Consent and Non-Consent/Freedom and Force is a Binary

Some people have commented in the past that I am too extreme or too far rightist. In the sense in which right means being for Capitalism VS Anti-Capitalism of some form. However, they are philosophically incorrect and not understanding of the essentials of right and left, of freedom and force or of consent and non-consent. You see force or breaking of consent is a binary and you either have consent/freedom or you have force/compulsion of the innocent. There is no such thing with this in mind as too in favor of Capitalism. There is no such thing as being too pro-Consent. There is no such thing as "extreme-right" or "Far-right" other than to separate yourself into being the pure form of rightism if needed. However, it is in the end an oxymoron as there is no degrees of Capitalism. There is no degrees of Consent Society and of freedom for the innocent. You either are free; to live, to think, to judge and then to act or you are not in which case you are a Surf.     

The options (Right or Left; Top or Bottom) are the binaries at the heart of all philosophy how mankind qua mankind should treat each other while living on Earth. It is a humane Ethical code put into practice in the political realm of the world and of philosophy. Anything that is not Right (On the Right) is Wrong/Evil and not correct or moral. Thus it is not I; the moral man with the fully coherent and fully rational moral code of conduct expanded to politics that needs to explain things. It is the immoral, the vile, the vicious and pernicious parasites that think government exists to cater to their entitled attitude that need to explain why they are not in the realm of politics either evil or wrong. Why is it right to force all other moral men and I's minds? What is your evidence for the need and moral backing of stopping our minds? Of squashing our very Human Spirits at the barrel of a gun? You do not get to control others because you grew up in a padded Snowflake friendly entitled world. 

I am not your Surf, I am not your Slave... I am a human being, a human mind and a living entity of your species. You have no right to make me your surf or your Slave. You have no right to demand my time or money be spent on what your values are at the expense of my own. I do not live for those whom demand sacrifices at every turn like I am a stuffed Turkey at your Thanksgiving. I am a man qua man and my freedom is Binary. As is all of yours. Freedom/Consent or Force/Non-Consent. It is a Binary; it is Right (Morally and Politically) or it is wrong (that which the Left politically represents and the Moderate Muddled compromise allows to poison the broth.) Even if one uses the term Top for Freedom and Bottom for degrees of force it is still a Binary one direction or the other. There is no other direction it is either Freedom/Consent or some level of evil, of wrongness of the vile thing known as force/non-consent in dealings with your neighbors. The Anti-Capitalism in any degree is the anti-mind, thus the anti-human and the anti-life. Moderates; those whom call me too extreme or too far-right are the ones that are wrong for they are in the end compromising with their own deaths. 

Capitalism is a Social System; it is not just "economic freedom."

There is a big misconception out there that Capitalism only means economic freedom in a Nation. This is something that even some people that claim to support free markets say about the system. Libertarians tend to push Capitalism as "the economic freedom." However, this is dead wrong as Economic Freedom is the outcome of Capitalism itself. Economic freedom is simply a corollary of truly being free to begin with. Capitalism is both social and economic freedom it is not separate from the other. In fact, freedom to trade is not even really "economic" freedom at all it is merely one manifestation of personal freedom as pertains to the right to trade with others for mutual benefit to mutual advantage in a consensual manor. If you have a "market" quote un quote, but, then you are told what to eat or whom to date or whom to marry you are in an authoritarian nightmare not Capitalism. 

The separation of Economic Freedom from the broader existence of the defense of individual rights leads to things like the nightmare of Anarcho-Capitalism to be seen as a freedom philosophy when it is the complete opposite. It helps make especially libertarians to be incoherent and philosophically deadly. This is yet another reason that one needs to differentiate between supporting any individual Libertarian Party, institute, group or Individual Candidate for matters of implementing policy VS supporting libertarianism the intellectual movement. Due to their lacking a coherent philosophy or a dedication intellectually to reality or reason there is no "reason" for them to see the error of their way of seeing Capitalism as only Economic freedom scales. 

This is one of the big differences from a broader Radical for Capitalism or even Classical Liberal from the libertarian movement. While some Classical Liberals make the same mistake it at least is not ingrained in the movement or the intellectual caste of the group. This is of course a major difference between Objectivists and Non-Objectivists as well in talking about freedom and Capitalism in general. As Objectivism IS a coherent and reality based philosophy it talks about Capitalism as it really is. Which is that it is in fact the only moral social system that could ever "grace" this Earth. This is because an Objectivist whom really understands their Philosophy has a coherent whole of views that all go together in a hierarchy that fit together into reality based concepts. Whereas most, but, not all libertarians are whim worshiping and subjectivist at heart. They in a fact take NAP this NAP as an abstraction and do not know how to defend the soul use of defensive force. 

This is spurned on because a lot of them while talking about supporting Capitalism do not even fully understand the breadth of what Capitalism is and means. What Capitalism is, is not just economic freedom as a lot of libertarians word it. It is in fact the identity of the only truly humane, free and just; AKA Moral Social System it is in fact defined as follows; 

Capitalism is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned.

The recognition of individual rights entails the banishment of physical force from human relationships: basically, rights can be violated only by means of force. In a capitalist society, no man or group may initiate the use of physical force against others. The only function of the government, in such a society, is the task of protecting man’s rights, i.e., the task of protecting him from physical force; the government acts as the agent of man’s right of self-defense, and may use force only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use; thus the government is the means of placing the retaliatory use of force under objective control.

When I say “capitalism,” I mean a full, pure, uncontrolled, unregulated laissez-faire capitalism—with a separation of state and economics, in the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of state and church.
The moral justification of capitalism does not lie in the altruist claim that it represents the best way to achieve “the common good.” It is true that capitalism does—if that catch-phrase has any meaning—but this is merely a secondary consequence. The moral justification of capitalism lies in the fact that it is the only system consonant with man’s rational nature, that it protects man’s survival qua man, and that its ruling principle is: justice.

In a capitalist society, all human relationships are voluntary. Men are free to cooperate or not, to deal with one another or not, as their own individual judgments, convictions, and interests dictate. They can deal with one another only in terms of and by means of reason, i.e., by means of discussion, persuasion, and contractual agreement, by voluntary choice to mutual benefit. The right to agree with others is not a problem in any society; it is the right to disagree that is crucial. It is the institution of private property that protects and implements the right to disagree—and thus keeps the road open to man’s most valuable attribute (valuable personally, socially, and objectively): the creative mind.

The essence of capitalism’s foreign policy is free trade—i.e., the abolition of trade barriers, of protective tariffs, of special privileges—the opening of the world’s trade routes to free international exchange and competition among the private citizens of all countries dealing directly with one another.

Laissez-faire capitalism is the only social system based on the recognition of individual rights and, therefore, the only system that bans force from social relationships.

I would recommend anyone that wants a properly explained and essentially defined look at Capitalism to find their nearest copy of "Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal," by Ms. Rand. To buy up a copy as quickly as possible to remove any Hobgoblins and residuals from the Anti-Capitalist mentality in your defending of this great system. The only truly moral system for mankind qua mankind. The above passages are all Copyright Ms. Rand's estate and all rights are reserved to the owners of the Ayn Rand Lexicon website. 

The Ugly Truth about Jordan Peterson

Recently a lot of people have been hopping onto the Jordan Peterson train simply because he is anti-PC. However, being anti-PC and being worth listening to are not the same thing. Neo-Nazis like Richard Spencer are anti-PC and they should not be listened to by anyone even though I fully support their right to their free atrocious speech. Now, I am not saying Jordan is like Richard Spencer in anyway, but, not everyone that is anti-PC is pro-reason or truth. In regards to Jordan he does the unthinkable he denies existence even exists and he evades that there is even an objective reality out there. He promotes mysticism of the mind and he is anti-truth even existing at all. 

In a recent podcast with Sam Harris; whom also denies the reality that free will exists. He went further than Harris ever has in saying truth is that which is useful and that there is no objective truth out there. Instead that it is what is useful that matters and what is moral is what aids continuing the species nothing else. This would explain how he can believe in a Monotheistic God of Judo-Christian origin. People embrace Jordan Peterson at their philosophical and intellectual peril. 

From Bottom To The Top it is from Left to Right

I was given a video yesterday dedicated to saying that the political spectrum essentially goes bottom to top. It was interesting to see that in the view of the creators it was authoritarians on the bottom and freedom at the top. The spectrum or compass does indeed go from tyranny on one end to freedom on the other. For only force or non-consent or coercion has degrees while freedom is a stable state of a specific social system. You have two options the moral social system which we call Capitalism. Or a system of levels of immorality attempted to be mixed with the moral. On the pure and far opposite end you have full on immorality with not even a shred of morality or justice left namely pure authoritarianism. It is individual rights on end and degrees of statism as you verge from it.

I disagree with the video when it claims that rightism is not an accurate way of describing that which they call the top. The right refers to the political element of the enshrining of individual rights and to the social system known as Capitalism. Capitalism is the actual name of the freedom it places at the top VS the Leftist authoritarianism it places at the bottom. Anti-Capitalism in some degree is what the Left stands for. The so-called moderates or centrists are not centered at all and in fact are unstable mixtures of the moral with the immoral. A combustible and deadly mixture of food and arsenic poisoning. A muddled and unprincipled, very much pragmatic mixture between a little bit of support for the Right social system and the wrong or evil one.

Contrary to what the video claims right vs left is absolutely the differences that matter. The right which is Capitalism; pure, true, unbridled and lassiez-faire Capitalism vs The left anti-Capitalists and the moderate muddled middle half anti-capitalists. This does not mean one could not use bottom and top as other symbols of individual rights vs statism. However, I think that even if one sees this is an alternative spectrum that does not invalidate or change the fact that what it calls the top is simply Right it is rightism irregardless of if the label is being changed. There is a right VS left that does matter and there being an alternative label does not change the content being the same. It is like saying I am straight or heterosexual. Deciding to use one label does not mean that it is not simply an interchanging of different references of the same essential. One does not remove the other.

If you define as top on the bottom to top spectrum it would be wrong to not define the essentials of and defend the right on a right vs left compass or spectrum. Capitalism is the social system of the right vs all the other compromises of the moderates and the authoritarianism of the left. The right means individual rights, individualism and the legal recognition of the mind/independent thought. The moderate middle compromises with the anti-mind and the left is the completely anti-mind and thus anti-life. Freedom is right VS varying levels of compromise with unjust force and authority up to the level of actual tyranny. The right belongs to the morally right, to the justly right and the socially right. To the only moral and truly humane social system. Capitalism equals rightism and rightism equals Capitalism.

Yaron Brook | Objectivism Is Radical and Applying It Can Be Hard