Lauren Daigle, Chris Pratt, Beyonce Knowles and the Compartmentalization...

I Found "Her" in Kentucky...

Brian Welch Gives Unbelievable Description of His "Conversion"...

Is Kenneth Copeland A Vampire? Pope Francis Invites Men In Drag

Alexander Pagani and NAR

5 Reasons You May Be Under Spiritual Attack & What To Do

The Importance of Addressing Modern Deliverance Ministry

4 Evidences for a Young Earth

New Age Practices: How To Overcome The Lure To Go Back

The Ultimate Gender War 1: Lucifer The Queen of Heaven

The Ultimate Gender War 0: In The Beginning

The Ultimate Gender War 2: The Mystery of Iniquity

Love Spells..Do they work? Former Witch Tells All

The Solar System: Part 1 - Origin Theories

Demonic Sleep Paralysis & the Cure

Warning: If You Think These Charismatics Love the Bible, You’re Wrong!

The Celebrity Video The Devil DOESN'T Want You To See

That Grooming Show

Demonic Encounters Of The Fourth Kind

Selling Your Soul For Advertising And Fame

Dante Bowe, Chris Tomlin, and Lecrae... Sacred or Secular?

Taylor Swift, P!nk, Demi Lovato And The Divine Feminine

The Demonic Spirit Behind Woke Smoke

Bill Johnson Setting The Stage For The End Times Delusion

Numbers Chapter 19 - The Holy Bible KJV Read Along

Lauren Boebert's Public Indecency, Andy Stanley's Apostasy

Amusement Park Amuses Satan, Britney Spears Demonic Downfall

Cultural Toxicity Against Biblical Masculinity

Robert Johnson: The Attraction Of Selling Your Soul

Matthew Perry's Cry For Help; Bishop Barron's False Gospel To Ben Shapiro

Kat Von D, The Occult And Christianity

The Sad Reality Of Conservatism Without Jesus

Taylor Swift: From High School Sweetheart to Provocative Witch

Numbers Chapter 17 - The Holy Bible KJV Read Along Audio

Does Scripture Agree with My Personal Experience?

From the New Age Frying pan to the Deliverance Fire

Fire of God

Astrology: Going to the stars and not the one who made them #astrology #...

What genuinely is a Christian fundamentalist? You should be one.

I am a Christian Fundamentalist as I am totally opposed to Modernism and False Gospels of liberal theology. I refuse to compromise on the fundamentals of true Christianity. Fundamentalism as I am using the term is a 20th-century anti-modern/liberal orthodox Christian movement. This definition is drawn from the history of the movement, from its inception in the early part of the 20th-century until the present.

To understand fundamentalism one must first understand its opponent: theological liberalism or modernism. The core of liberalism is its reliance on experience over doctrine. Thus the liberal will maintain that the Bible is not necessarily true doctrine but merely information about people’s experience with God. A liberal will appeal to the individual experience of a Christian as the basis of authority. The power of liberalism comes from its use of Christian language with a new definition. Since they reject the objective truth and rely on experience, then words such as ‘salvation,’ ‘Christ,’ and ‘resurrection’ are not taken from the Bible but redefined in a subjective or modern sense. This new definition is formed using modern principles of criticism, science, and philosophy. Thus liberalism is an experience-based theology, that rejects the inerrancy of Scripture in favor of subject personal relationships and modern scientific methods. Though some would define it differently, to do so would reject the writings and arguments of the vast majority of fundamentalists over the past century.

To understand fundamentalism is to place it in its proper context, namely 20th-century America. Fundamentalism’s anti-modernist nature necessitates that there exist modernism for it to oppose. Thus before the late 1800s and early 1900s fundamentalism could not exist because liberalism did not exist, at least not as a movement or theology. To attempt to find fundamentalism in the centuries prior is impossible, though you may find individual aspects of it, such as doctrinal purity or separatism. Only when Christianity was mixed with modern methods of science, history, and theology would there be a need for a group to oppose it. This is the movement we call fundamentalism.

The most basic aspect of fundamentalism is its adherence to the inerrancy of Scripture. This can be defined as a belief in the inspiration of the Scriptures by God that completely rules out any possible error in the transmission, so that what the writers penned on paper was completely true: doctrinally, historically, and scientifically. This view is not a strictly fundamentalist view, as other conservative denomination and groups have also ascribed to it, but it is an essential part of its doctrine. Along with the inspiration of Scripture, fundamentalist hold to four other doctrines, collectively entitled “The Five Fundamentals of the Faith:”

1) Inerrancy of Scriptures

2) Virgin Birth

3) Christ’s Substitutionary Atonement

4) Christ’s Bodily Resurrection

5) The Second Coming of Christ

While many individual would hold more than these, no fundamentalist could hold less. For instance, a dispensationalist view would later become a hallmark of fundamentalism, but was rejected by J. Gresham Machen, leader of Presbyterian Fundamentalism, and Williams Jennings Bryan, who fought evolution in the Scopes Monkey Trial.

The guiding principle in fundamentalist thought is that the inerrant Bible is foundational to knowledge, and that modernism, with its accompanying ideas of subjectivism, Darwinism and higher criticism, is to be rejected.

The final mark of fundamentalism is its willingness to separate from liberalism. This was evidenced in various leaders of the movement: Machen left Princeton and founded Westminster Theological Seminary, J. Frank Norris left (or was kicked out) of the Southern Baptist Convention, John R. Rice separated from the Southern Baptist Convention and then later from Billy Graham when he associated with liberals. While these men did not categorize these groups as liberal, they believed that they were tolerant of such, and thus separated to defend doctrinal purity.

If the disjunction is between "Christian Fundamentalism" and "Modernism," then I am a Christian Fundamentalist of the most pronounced type.

“Fundamentalism (in so far as consistent Biblical Theology is meant by this term) is in principle nothing but Christianity itself.”

“‘Fundamentalism’ is the only consistently thought-out version of the faith, and the ‘Fundamentalist’ is the only Christian who uses his mind in a fully Christian way.” —J. I. Packer

“The deepest cleavages in Christendom are doctrinal; and the deepest doctrinal cleavages are those which result from disagreement about authority.”

“Sham unity is not worth working for, and real unity, that fellowship of love in the truth which Christ prayed that His disciples might enjoy, will come only as those sections of the wall which rest on unsound foundations are dismantled and rebuilt.” —J. I. Packer

People use the term “fundamentalist” in a disparaging sense because of a handful of bad apples who abuse the title At its core, fundamentalism is about nothing more than getting back to fundamental tenets and beliefs of Christianity, following what the Bible says and guided (but not reliant upon) the historical understanding of scripture by the early Church and Church Fathers.

What is The Gospel?

God Created all things and said it was good. He placed the first man and woman in The Garden of Eden. They were named Adam and Eve. Through the persuasion of an evil entity in the form of a serpent Adam and Eve died spirituality due to eating from a forbidden tree.

This caused the curse of the entire creation and all humans being born in radical depravity and separated from God (spiritually dead). A slave to sin and bound to physical death leading to eternal judgment in a place called hell. The justice we all deserve for our sin nature. 

However, God so loved the world that He gave His only Begotten Son through crucifixion on a cross as an Atonement for the whole world He so loved. So, that whomsoever in the Whole World believes on Him (Jesus Christ) with a Godly repentance will not perish, but, will have eternal life. 

Ones salvation is based on a genuine free will decision to accept or reject God's Grace and to thus not take part in God's desire to save you. The Atonement and Christ's Blood is for all! God's Grace frees you from your Depravity to respond by, repentance, belief and True Faith. This causes you to be placed in Christ's sheep fold and the Blood of Chris to be applied to you.

This leaves those that have not done so with actually only themselves to blame for going to eternal damnation and the fires of eternal hell. So, I plead with you to not ignore the call and drawing of The Father through His Holy Spirit. While Salvation has been provided for you it is up to you to accept God's Free Gift and Provision to you. 

Christ is not a way, but, The Way, Truth and Life. No one gets saved; into the Kingdom of God and then on the New Heavens/New Earth. Until accepting your depravity and responding in repentance and True Faith on Christ and His accomplishments on Your behalf.

It is the most important thing you will ever do! Once you have True Faith God and His Holy Spirit has promised to keep you sealed as His Own Until the End of all things has come. Repent, believe today and come to Christ! While the time is at hand! 

The Bible mandates free market capitalism. It is an anti-socialist document.

The essence of democratic socialism is this re-written version of God's commandment: "Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote."

"Economic democracy" is the system whereby two wolves and a sheep vote on what to have for dinner. Christian socialists and defenders of economic planning by state bureaucrats deeply resent this interpretation of their ethical position. They resent it because it's accurate. When Christianity adheres to the judicial specifics of the Bible, it produces free market capitalism.

On the other hand, when Christianity rejects the judicial specifics of the Bible, it produces socialism or some politically run hybrid "middle way" between capitalism and socialism, where politicians and bureaucrats make the big decisions about how people's wealth will be allocated. Economic growth then slows or is reversed. Always.

Free market capitalism produces long-term economic growth. Socialism and middle-way economic interventionism by the state produce poverty and bureaucracy. If your goal is to keep poor people poor, generation after generation, you should promote socialism. But be sure to call it economic democracy in order to fool the voters.

The Bible is an anti-socialist document. Socialist propagandists for over four centuries have claimed that the Bible teaches socialism, but we have yet to see a single Bible commentary written by a socialist. If the Bible teaches socialism, where is the expository evidence?

When I say that the Bible mandates a moral and legal social order that inevitably produces free market capitalism, I have the evidence to back up my position. My critics -- critics of capitalism -- do not.

The next time you hear someone say that the Bible teaches anything but free market capitalism, ask him or her which Bible commentary demonstrates this. You will get a blank stare followed by a lot of verbal tap-dancing about "the ultimate ethic of the Bible" or "the upholding of the poor in the Bible." You will be given a lot of blah, blah, blah. Blah, blah, blah is not a valid substitute for biblical exposition.

Fact: There has never been an expository Bible commentary that shows that the Bible teaches anything other than free market capitalism.

History Education for KJB Believers - lecture by Chris Pinto

 

The Georgia Guidestones | Chris Pinto

Human Trafficking Defined

I Found This Crazy Church in San Francisco!!! Goddess Rosary Beads?!?!?!

"David's New Cart" - Vance Havner

Ethereal Magic at the GMA Dove Awards....

URC of PEI | November 5th, 2023 | Morning Service

Sleep Paralysis: Demonic? #sleepparalysis #demonic #spiritualwarfare

Mike Bickle: Dumb, Creepy, or a Monster?